DEJURE Foundation filed a complaint against Serhiy Burlakov, a member of the HCJ. He is delaying the consideration of the disciplinary case against Vsevolod Knyazev - ABA3C
Back

DEJURE Foundation filed a complaint against Serhiy Burlakov, a member of the HCJ. He is delaying the consideration of the disciplinary case against Vsevolod Knyazev

Today, on April 11, a complaint was lodged against Serhiy Burlakov, a member of the HCJ, accusing him of stalling the disciplinary proceedings concerning Vsevolod Knyazev.

Previously, in June 2023, our lawyer, Marta Bereza, filed a complaint against Vsevolod Knyazev for alleged bribery. Such grave misconduct normally warrants dismissal. However, Knyazev has continued to serve as a judge, earning a monthly salary of approximately UAH 200,000. The complaint was assigned to Burlakov in November, and a disciplinary case was initiated on December 20.

Legally, the consideration of such cases must be completed within 90 days from initiation. Moreover, the HCJ’s regulations require that a report and a proposed decision be prepared within 30 days of the case’s commencement. Additionally, the HCJ, by its regulations, has committed to establishing transparent and definitive criteria for prioritising complaints based on public interest.

However, the legally prescribed deadline has been exceeded by several weeks, indicating a deliberate delay in handling a case that has garnered significant public attention due to the controversial nature of the odious individual and related events. Furthermore, on January 31, Burlakov attempted to halt the proceedings without justifiable reasons. It has been observed that Burlakov sporadically issues requests related to this disciplinary case to various bodies but does so inconsistently and without transparent rationale.

Burlakov, who holds an active judgeship while seconded to the HCJ, is subject to the same standards as other judges, including potential disciplinary action for undue delays in processing complaints. His role at the HCJ demands genuine effort rather than mere semblance of action.

Other news
To the section
The Committee recommended adopting an even worse draft law than the one criticised by the Venice Commission
The Committee recommended adopting an even worse draft law than the one criticised by the Venice Commission

On 30 September, the Verkhovna Rada Committee on Legal Policy recommended that Parliament adopt, as a basis, draft law No. 16018 on competitions for the High Qualifications Commission of Judges and the High Council of Justice. The authors of the draft law are Volodymyr Vatras, Ivan Kalaur and Mykola...

Venice Commission has criticised the government’s model of selection to the HQCJ
Venice Commission has criticised the government’s model of selection to the HQCJ

The High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) selects candidates for judicial positions and evaluates sitting judges. Its decisions determine who will work in Ukrainian courts. That is why it is crucial who selects the members of the HQCJ itself, and under what rules. In 2027, almost the entir...

€286 million for a “reform” that helps judges avoid accountability?
€286 million for a “reform” that helps judges avoid accountability?

The EU is about to pay Ukraine €3 billion for 10 implemented reforms. One of them is an updated review of judges’ integrity declarations. That one alone carries a payment of €286 million. According to European Pravda, the European Commission is proposing to disburse the funds to Ukraine un...

Special by topic
To the section
Supreme Court Unmasked: Corruption, Opposing Reforms and Russian Passports
THE “REBOOTED” HIGH COUNCIL OF JUSTICE:WINS AND FAILS
Judicial reform roadmap