DEJURE Foundation on the Public Integrity Council’s decision to expel one of its members - CD751
Back

DEJURE Foundation on the Public Integrity Council’s decision to expel one of its members

Today, it became known that the Public Integrity Council (PIC) had decided to expel Serhii Fesenko from its membership. The decision was based on substantiated concerns regarding his academic integrity in the process of writing his dissertation.

We believe that adherence to the principles of integrity is fundamental both to the selection of judges and to the work of the PIC itself. Serhii Fesenko was delegated to the PIC by the DEJURE Foundation. At the time, we had no information that would have cast doubt on his compliance with integrity standards.

At the same time, the DEJURE Foundation, in cooperation with the current composition of the PIC and other organisations, is working on improving the mechanisms for delegating representatives to the PIC.

We believe that the timely response of the Public Integrity Council to circumstances related to one of its members demonstrates consistency in adhering to its own principles.

The DEJURE Foundation will continue to support the PIC in its activities and in upholding integrity standards.

Other news
To the section
New rules bring new risks. What the draft law on the selection of HCJ members changes
New rules bring new risks. What the draft law on the selection of HCJ members changes

The government’s draft law submitted to the Venice Commission for consideration, in addition to a new procedure for forming the HQCJ, also substantially changes the procedures for electing (appointing) members of the High Council of Justice (HCJ). The proposed changes may create new risks for...

The government proposes a “broken bicycle” for international experts in the commission selecting HQCJ members
The government proposes a “broken bicycle” for international experts in the commission selecting HQCJ members

The High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) is a body that can recommend a person for the position of judge or recommend their dismissal. That is, whoever decides your case, should you suddenly have to go to court, depends on the HQCJ’s assessment. Judges over judges, so to speak. Logi...

DACK cases and judges can end up in the same court again
DACK cases and judges can end up in the same court again

The High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) has recommended transferring 6 judges of the liquidated DACK to the Kyiv District Administrative Court (KDAC). All the cases of the liquidated DACK had previously been transferred to the KDAC as well. In other words, the nameplate has changed, but...

Special by topic
To the section
Bar Reform Roadmap
Supreme Court Unmasked: Corruption, Opposing Reforms and Russian Passports
Judicial Reform Roadmap