Draft law 7033-д Restricts Access to Court Decisions - 6EE14
Back

Draft law 7033-д Restricts Access to Court Decisions

MPs have decided to limit citizens’ access to information. On March 19, the Legal Policy Committee recommended the revised draft law No. 7033-д, which proposes restricting access to certain court decisions.

Previously, DEJURE Foundation had already highlighted the risks posed by this draft law. Along with other NGOs, we urged MPs not to support it. Draft law No. 7033-д has been brought to the floor of the Verkhovna Rada for voting multiple times but has not been adopted. Additionally, as early as 2023, the National Agency on Corruption Prevention (NACP) identified corruption risks in 7033-д — flaws that could foster corruption and violate other provisions of Ukrainian law.

The text of this draft law was revised in a subcommittee, but its final version has not been made public. It remains unclear whether the Legal Policy Committee has addressed all public concerns and removed the harmful provisions. If not, this draft law poses a threat to the justice system, freedom of speech, and public access to information — especially during wartime and in the post-war period.

Other news
To the section
New rules bring new risks. What the draft law on the selection of HCJ members changes
New rules bring new risks. What the draft law on the selection of HCJ members changes

The government’s draft law submitted to the Venice Commission for consideration, in addition to a new procedure for forming the HQCJ, also substantially changes the procedures for electing (appointing) members of the High Council of Justice (HCJ). The proposed changes may create new risks for...

The government proposes a “broken bicycle” for international experts in the commission selecting HQCJ members
The government proposes a “broken bicycle” for international experts in the commission selecting HQCJ members

The High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) is a body that can recommend a person for the position of judge or recommend their dismissal. That is, whoever decides your case, should you suddenly have to go to court, depends on the HQCJ’s assessment. Judges over judges, so to speak. Logi...

DACK cases and judges can end up in the same court again
DACK cases and judges can end up in the same court again

The High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) has recommended transferring 6 judges of the liquidated DACK to the Kyiv District Administrative Court (KDAC). All the cases of the liquidated DACK had previously been transferred to the KDAC as well. In other words, the nameplate has changed, but...

Special by topic
To the section
Bar Reform Roadmap
Supreme Court Unmasked: Corruption, Opposing Reforms and Russian Passports
Judicial Reform Roadmap