Ethics Council recommends candidates for the High Council of Justice - ACF66
Back

Ethics Council recommends candidates for the High Council of Justice

On 14 July, the Ethics Council found five candidates for the High Council of Justice to meet the criteria of professional ethics and integrity. They are Iryna Davydovych, Oleksandr Zhytnyi, Lesia Muzyka, Ivan Nazarov, and Tetiana Tsuvina.

Five candidates were found not to meet the criteria. They are Pavlo Hultai, Mykola Kucheriavenko, Yaroslav Melnyk, Raisa Minchenko, and Nataliia Savinova.

This competition for the High Council of Justice is being held under the quota for representatives of higher education institutions. Next, on 27 August, a congress of academics is to elect a new member of the High Council of Justice, but questions remain about some of the candidates.

During Tetiana Tsuvina’s interview, it emerged that the Specialised Anti-Corruption Prosecutor’s Office had sent a letter concerning possible influence on members of the commission that selected the head of the National Agency on Corruption Prevention, where Tsuvina had served as deputy head. The letter reportedly referred, among other things, to synchronised voting by commission members in favour of a pro-government candidate. The candidate herself denied any pressure or communication with the Cabinet of Ministers regarding the candidates and stated that she is not the subject of any criminal proceedings. Part of the interview was held in closed session.

Filling the vacant seats on the High Council of Justice is indeed necessary. Due to a lack of quorum, the Council cannot consider important matters, including those concerning judges of the liquidated DACK. Now the delegates of the congress of academics must elect a worthy candidate to the High Council of Justice — one who will strengthen the Council’s work and not raise doubts about its independence.

Other news
To the section
The Committee recommended adopting an even worse draft law than the one criticised by the Venice Commission
The Committee recommended adopting an even worse draft law than the one criticised by the Venice Commission

On 30 September, the Verkhovna Rada Committee on Legal Policy recommended that Parliament adopt, as a basis, draft law No. 16018 on competitions for the High Qualifications Commission of Judges and the High Council of Justice. The authors of the draft law are Volodymyr Vatras, Ivan Kalaur and Mykola...

Venice Commission has criticised the government’s model of selection to the HQCJ
Venice Commission has criticised the government’s model of selection to the HQCJ

The High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) selects candidates for judicial positions and evaluates sitting judges. Its decisions determine who will work in Ukrainian courts. That is why it is crucial who selects the members of the HQCJ itself, and under what rules. In 2027, almost the entir...

€286 million for a “reform” that helps judges avoid accountability?
€286 million for a “reform” that helps judges avoid accountability?

The EU is about to pay Ukraine €3 billion for 10 implemented reforms. One of them is an updated review of judges’ integrity declarations. That one alone carries a payment of €286 million. According to European Pravda, the European Commission is proposing to disburse the funds to Ukraine un...

Special by topic
To the section
THE “REBOOTED” HIGH COUNCIL OF JUSTICE:WINS AND FAILS
Judicial reform roadmap