International experts may return: draft law registered in the Parliament - CAD16
Back

International experts may return: draft law registered in the Parliament

A new draft law No. 13382 has been registered in the Verkhovna Rada to bring back independent international experts to the judicial selection process. It concerns the Selection Commission responsible for choosing candidates for the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine (HQCJ).

The initiative was submitted by 11 members of parliament: 6 from the “Servant of the People” faction and 5 from the “Holos” party. The draft law is authored by Anastasiia Radina, Oleksii Movchan, Yevheniia Kravchuk, Oleksii Zhmerenetskyi, Volodymyr Tsabal, Maksym Khliapuk, Roman Hryshchuk, Yaroslav Zhelezniak, Yaroslav Yurchyshyn, Oleksandra Ustinova, and Roksolana Pidlasa.

They propose extending the mandate of international experts in the Selection Commission for at least three more years.

Just recently, 90 civil society organisations called on the President and Parliament to preserve and extend the involvement of international experts in selection commissions. We thank the MPs who are willing to hear the voice of civil society and defend justice reform.

To recap, the mandate of the previous composition of the Selection Commission expired on June 1. Now, representatives of the old Portnov-Medvedchuk elite are seeking to replace international experts. They are attacking the High Council of Justice (HCJ) to appoint their delegates to the HQCJ selection process — a scenario that risks the appointment of low-integrity judges for decades to come.

The DEJURE Foundation notes that the current compositions of the HQCJ and HCJ — selected with international expert involvement — have shown significant progress compared to their predecessors.

We urge members of parliament to urgently consider this draft law and restore a successful model of selection for Ukraine’s judicial governance bodies!

Other news
To the section
The Committee recommended adopting an even worse draft law than the one criticised by the Venice Commission
The Committee recommended adopting an even worse draft law than the one criticised by the Venice Commission

On 30 September, the Verkhovna Rada Committee on Legal Policy recommended that Parliament adopt, as a basis, draft law No. 16018 on competitions for the High Qualifications Commission of Judges and the High Council of Justice. The authors of the draft law are Volodymyr Vatras, Ivan Kalaur and Mykola...

Venice Commission has criticised the government’s model of selection to the HQCJ
Venice Commission has criticised the government’s model of selection to the HQCJ

The High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) selects candidates for judicial positions and evaluates sitting judges. Its decisions determine who will work in Ukrainian courts. That is why it is crucial who selects the members of the HQCJ itself, and under what rules. In 2027, almost the entir...

€286 million for a “reform” that helps judges avoid accountability?
€286 million for a “reform” that helps judges avoid accountability?

The EU is about to pay Ukraine €3 billion for 10 implemented reforms. One of them is an updated review of judges’ integrity declarations. That one alone carries a payment of €286 million. According to European Pravda, the European Commission is proposing to disburse the funds to Ukraine un...

Special by topic
To the section
HQCJ:Accomplishments and Problems
Judicial reform roadmap