Lost donation: did the Ukrainian National Bar Association and bar councils really not transfer funds to the armed forces? - 3C093
Back

Lost donation: did the Ukrainian National Bar Association and bar councils really not transfer funds to the armed forces?

Recently, DEJURE Foundation highlighted how the Ukrainian National Bar Association (UNBA) has been concealing the amount it has transferred to support the Armed Forces of Ukraine and other law enforcement agencies since February 24, 2022. It now appears there was a reason for this secrecy: it seems no funds were transferred at all.

DEJURE recalls that the court has twice mandated the UNBA to disclose this information. In response to the first ruling, UNBA claimed that bar councils transferred approximately 10 million UAH to support the Armed Forces. Additionally, UNBA stated that 345,000 UAH were transferred to the special account of the National Bank of Ukraine for army needs on February 28, 2022. However, the provided UNBA letter only included a payment order for the transfer to the National Bank, without any proof that 10 million UAH were actually sent to the Armed Forces. Notably, the UNBA attempted to keep this letter under wraps, sending it solely to the state executor, not to the plaintiff.

Meanwhile, lawyer Artem Donets sent inquiries to the General Staff of the Armed Forces, the Ministry of Defense, the National Police, the Security Service of Ukraine, the State Emergency Service of Ukraine, and the Ministry of Internal Affairs, asking whether they received financial or humanitarian aid from the UNBA, bar councils or the Higher Qualification and Disciplinary Commission of the Bar. All these agencies confirmed that they had not received any support from the mentioned bodies.

Since the beginning of the full-scale war, the UNBA has declared its support for the Ukrainian military in the fight against Russian aggression. However, the association has failed to provide evidence to back these claims and has even tried to conceal related data. The responses from law enforcement agencies suggest that UNBA’s declarations are likely unsubstantiated, raising renewed concerns about potential Russian influence on the leadership of the Ukrainian legal profession.

Other news
To the section
New rules bring new risks. What the draft law on the selection of HCJ members changes
New rules bring new risks. What the draft law on the selection of HCJ members changes

The government’s draft law submitted to the Venice Commission for consideration, in addition to a new procedure for forming the HQCJ, also substantially changes the procedures for electing (appointing) members of the High Council of Justice (HCJ). The proposed changes may create new risks for...

The government proposes a “broken bicycle” for international experts in the commission selecting HQCJ members
The government proposes a “broken bicycle” for international experts in the commission selecting HQCJ members

The High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) is a body that can recommend a person for the position of judge or recommend their dismissal. That is, whoever decides your case, should you suddenly have to go to court, depends on the HQCJ’s assessment. Judges over judges, so to speak. Logi...

DACK cases and judges can end up in the same court again
DACK cases and judges can end up in the same court again

The High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) has recommended transferring 6 judges of the liquidated DACK to the Kyiv District Administrative Court (KDAC). All the cases of the liquidated DACK had previously been transferred to the KDAC as well. In other words, the nameplate has changed, but...