Lost donation: did the Ukrainian National Bar Association and bar councils really not transfer funds to the armed forces? - 85340
Back

Lost donation: did the Ukrainian National Bar Association and bar councils really not transfer funds to the armed forces?

Recently, DEJURE Foundation highlighted how the Ukrainian National Bar Association (UNBA) has been concealing the amount it has transferred to support the Armed Forces of Ukraine and other law enforcement agencies since February 24, 2022. It now appears there was a reason for this secrecy: it seems no funds were transferred at all.

DEJURE recalls that the court has twice mandated the UNBA to disclose this information. In response to the first ruling, UNBA claimed that bar councils transferred approximately 10 million UAH to support the Armed Forces. Additionally, UNBA stated that 345,000 UAH were transferred to the special account of the National Bank of Ukraine for army needs on February 28, 2022. However, the provided UNBA letter only included a payment order for the transfer to the National Bank, without any proof that 10 million UAH were actually sent to the Armed Forces. Notably, the UNBA attempted to keep this letter under wraps, sending it solely to the state executor, not to the plaintiff.

Meanwhile, lawyer Artem Donets sent inquiries to the General Staff of the Armed Forces, the Ministry of Defense, the National Police, the Security Service of Ukraine, the State Emergency Service of Ukraine, and the Ministry of Internal Affairs, asking whether they received financial or humanitarian aid from the UNBA, bar councils or the Higher Qualification and Disciplinary Commission of the Bar. All these agencies confirmed that they had not received any support from the mentioned bodies.

Since the beginning of the full-scale war, the UNBA has declared its support for the Ukrainian military in the fight against Russian aggression. However, the association has failed to provide evidence to back these claims and has even tried to conceal related data. The responses from law enforcement agencies suggest that UNBA’s declarations are likely unsubstantiated, raising renewed concerns about potential Russian influence on the leadership of the Ukrainian legal profession.

Other news
To the section
The Committee recommended adopting an even worse draft law than the one criticised by the Venice Commission
The Committee recommended adopting an even worse draft law than the one criticised by the Venice Commission

On 30 September, the Verkhovna Rada Committee on Legal Policy recommended that Parliament adopt, as a basis, draft law No. 16018 on competitions for the High Qualifications Commission of Judges and the High Council of Justice. The authors of the draft law are Volodymyr Vatras, Ivan Kalaur and Mykola...

Venice Commission has criticised the government’s model of selection to the HQCJ
Venice Commission has criticised the government’s model of selection to the HQCJ

The High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) selects candidates for judicial positions and evaluates sitting judges. Its decisions determine who will work in Ukrainian courts. That is why it is crucial who selects the members of the HQCJ itself, and under what rules. In 2027, almost the entir...

Izovitova is concealing the decision that has allowed her to lead the attorney profession for 14 years
Izovitova is concealing the decision that has allowed her to lead the attorney profession for 14 years

On the left in the image is Serhii Osyka, an attorney and member of the Bar Council of Ukraine (BCU). In 2022, he took part in adopting the BCU decision that allows Medvedchuk’s associate Lidiia Izovitova to avoid elections within the attorney profession and to lead it for the 14th year now. Izovi...