Pavlo Vovk Finally Dismissed from Office - 88EC2
Back

Pavlo Vovk Finally Dismissed from Office

The High Council of Justice has officially dismissed the odious head of the District Administrative Court of Kyiv (DACK), Pavlo Vovk, for committing a significant disciplinary offence. The HCJ made this decision unanimously.

Vovk filed complaints against certain HCJ members and attempted to challenge them during the hearing, but the HCJ rejected his motions. This time, the former head of DACK also sought to postpone the review, arguing that:

  • He was on sick leave and was allegedly informed about the hearing too late;
  • He had hired a new lawyer and filed a complaint against the decision of the Third Disciplinary Chamber regarding his dismissal;
  • He considered the HCJ illegitimate.

All Council members, except Burlakov, voted against his request. After that, the Council unanimously decided to dismiss Vovk.

More about the former head of DACK can be found at the link.

DEJURE Foundation welcomes this decision by the Council. The dismissal of Pavlo Vovk is a major step toward a truly cleansed and independent judiciary. Most likely, Vovk will challenge his dismissal in the Supreme Court. This will reveal whose interests the Supreme Court truly serves.

Other news
To the section
The Committee recommended adopting an even worse draft law than the one criticised by the Venice Commission
The Committee recommended adopting an even worse draft law than the one criticised by the Venice Commission

On 30 September, the Verkhovna Rada Committee on Legal Policy recommended that Parliament adopt, as a basis, draft law No. 16018 on competitions for the High Qualifications Commission of Judges and the High Council of Justice. The authors of the draft law are Volodymyr Vatras, Ivan Kalaur and Mykola...

Venice Commission has criticised the government’s model of selection to the HQCJ
Venice Commission has criticised the government’s model of selection to the HQCJ

The High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) selects candidates for judicial positions and evaluates sitting judges. Its decisions determine who will work in Ukrainian courts. That is why it is crucial who selects the members of the HQCJ itself, and under what rules. In 2027, almost the entir...

€286 million for a “reform” that helps judges avoid accountability?
€286 million for a “reform” that helps judges avoid accountability?

The EU is about to pay Ukraine €3 billion for 10 implemented reforms. One of them is an updated review of judges’ integrity declarations. That one alone carries a payment of €286 million. According to European Pravda, the European Commission is proposing to disburse the funds to Ukraine un...

Special by topic
To the section
THE “REBOOTED” HIGH COUNCIL OF JUSTICE:WINS AND FAILS
Judicial reform roadmap