“Perpetual integrity” for judges and HCJ members - EDBE7
Back

“Perpetual integrity” for judges and HCJ members

The High Council of Justice (HCJ) has effectively granted judges with integrity reservations a lifeline to remain in office despite their concerning records. Moreover, it has practically ensured that HCJ members are deemed “decent” for life.

On December 17, the HCJ approved the Unified Standards of Integrity and Professional Ethics for Judges and Judicial Candidates. Under these new rules, if a commission with international experts declares a judge or candidate to be of high integrity, any circumstances reviewed during that process — even those pointing to integrity concerns — cannot be reassessed. This provides what is essentially a lifetime pass for questionable actions prior to the interview.

DEJURE Foundation previously highlighted that mixed-format commissions (comprising members appointed by both international partners and Ukrainian authorities) often yield mixed results. As a result, certain ethically questionable candidates have been approved for positions in the HCJ and the HQCJ. The “perpetual integrity” provision in the new standards now allows such individuals to secure judicial roles despite unresolved concerns about their past conduct.

Importantly, the HCJ members themselves were assessed by a similar mixed-format body, the Ethics Council. This means all current HCJ members are now automatically deemed to have integrity when participating in future selection processes — a clear conflict of interest since they voted for the adoption of this provision. This change already benefits three HCJ members — Inna Plakhtiy, Yuliia Bokova, and Mykola Moroz — who are candidates in appellate court competitions. Under the new rules, the HQCJ cannot thoroughly assess their integrity but must rely only on what was reviewed during their Ethics Council interviews. The same privileges extend to all judges and candidates who were ever declared decent by commissions involving international experts.

Some other problematic provisions, such as time limits on integrity reviews, have been removed. However, the “perpetual integrity” clause remains highly detrimental.

DEJURE Foundation calls on the HCJ to urgently revise the Unified Standards and eliminate the harmful “perpetual integrity” provision. This measure significantly hampers the cleansing of the judiciary and, consequently, delays critical judicial reform.

Other news
To the section
New rules bring new risks. What the draft law on the selection of HCJ members changes
New rules bring new risks. What the draft law on the selection of HCJ members changes

The government’s draft law submitted to the Venice Commission for consideration, in addition to a new procedure for forming the HQCJ, also substantially changes the procedures for electing (appointing) members of the High Council of Justice (HCJ). The proposed changes may create new risks for...

The government proposes a “broken bicycle” for international experts in the commission selecting HQCJ members
The government proposes a “broken bicycle” for international experts in the commission selecting HQCJ members

The High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) is a body that can recommend a person for the position of judge or recommend their dismissal. That is, whoever decides your case, should you suddenly have to go to court, depends on the HQCJ’s assessment. Judges over judges, so to speak. Logi...

DACK cases and judges can end up in the same court again
DACK cases and judges can end up in the same court again

The High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) has recommended transferring 6 judges of the liquidated DACK to the Kyiv District Administrative Court (KDAC). All the cases of the liquidated DACK had previously been transferred to the KDAC as well. In other words, the nameplate has changed, but...

Special by topic
To the section
THE “REBOOTED” HIGH COUNCIL OF JUSTICE:WINS AND FAILS
Judicial reform roadmap