The DEJURE Foundation gets recognized for transparency - A7178
Back

The DEJURE Foundation gets recognized for transparency

Читати українською

The DEJURE Foundation got the highest 5-stars rank in the global rating of major think tanks’ financial transparency provided by Transparify. 

The Transparify initiative monitors over 150 think tanks in over 40 countries of the world and rates the extent to which they publicly disclose their sources of funding, the amount of funding they have received, and the specific research projects that were supported by this funding.

Striving to establish a just and trusted judiciary in Ukraine, the DEJURE Foundation leads by example. And we are happy to be recognized as such.

“– Transparency and integrity are in our organization’s core values. As we fight to establish transparent practices in the judiciary, for example in the judges’ assets, decision-making process or appointment procedures, we set the same high standards for ourselves.

It’s important for us to have the trust of the citizens of Ukraine. So we make sure our partnerships, financial structures, and funding sources are legal and transparent for everyone to see that there’s no money from oligarchs or political parties involved,”

– says Iryna Shyba, DEJURE Foundation Executive Director 

Other news
To the section
New rules bring new risks. What the draft law on the selection of HCJ members changes
New rules bring new risks. What the draft law on the selection of HCJ members changes

The government’s draft law submitted to the Venice Commission for consideration, in addition to a new procedure for forming the HQCJ, also substantially changes the procedures for electing (appointing) members of the High Council of Justice (HCJ). The proposed changes may create new risks for...

The government proposes a “broken bicycle” for international experts in the commission selecting HQCJ members
The government proposes a “broken bicycle” for international experts in the commission selecting HQCJ members

The High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) is a body that can recommend a person for the position of judge or recommend their dismissal. That is, whoever decides your case, should you suddenly have to go to court, depends on the HQCJ’s assessment. Judges over judges, so to speak. Logi...

DACK cases and judges can end up in the same court again
DACK cases and judges can end up in the same court again

The High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) has recommended transferring 6 judges of the liquidated DACK to the Kyiv District Administrative Court (KDAC). All the cases of the liquidated DACK had previously been transferred to the KDAC as well. In other words, the nameplate has changed, but...

Special by topic
To the section
Bar Reform Roadmap
Supreme Court Unmasked: Corruption, Opposing Reforms and Russian Passports
Judicial Reform Roadmap