The Council of Judges has no plans to appoint new Constitutional Court judges? - E9AC5
Back

The Council of Judges has no plans to appoint new Constitutional Court judges?

Time passes, yet there are still no judges for the Constitutional Court appointed by the Congress of Judges. It seems there won’t be any in the near future. According to our colleagues from the AntAC, the Council of Judges does not plan to announce the convening of the Congress of Judges of Ukraine to address this issue.

Currently, there are 13 out of 18 judges in the Constitutional Court. By law, it can only function if it has at least 12 judges. Thus, due to the Council of Judges’ delays, the work of the Constitutional Court might be blocked.

Previously, the G7 Ambassadors urged the Congress of Judges to convene and appoint a judge of the Constitutional Court. However, this call seems to have been ignored.

These delays are unacceptable, though not surprising given who heads the Council of Judges. Monich is one of the figures implicated in the “Vovk’s tapes.” He has publicly defended the judges of the District Administrative Court of Kyiv and actively sabotaged the creation of the Ethics Council with international experts. The Council of Judges’ leadership, along with their colleagues, is accustomed to placing their assosiated in key positions behind closed doors, without foreign involvement.

The Council of Judges once again reveals its true nature, raising the question of its continued existence. Draft law No. 8342 could solve this problem by providing for the dissolution of the Council of Judges as a self-governing body and transferring its powers to the High Council of Justice. However, this draft law has yet to be passed.

Other news
To the section
New rules bring new risks. What the draft law on the selection of HCJ members changes
New rules bring new risks. What the draft law on the selection of HCJ members changes

The government’s draft law submitted to the Venice Commission for consideration, in addition to a new procedure for forming the HQCJ, also substantially changes the procedures for electing (appointing) members of the High Council of Justice (HCJ). The proposed changes may create new risks for...

The government proposes a “broken bicycle” for international experts in the commission selecting HQCJ members
The government proposes a “broken bicycle” for international experts in the commission selecting HQCJ members

The High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) is a body that can recommend a person for the position of judge or recommend their dismissal. That is, whoever decides your case, should you suddenly have to go to court, depends on the HQCJ’s assessment. Judges over judges, so to speak. Logi...

DACK cases and judges can end up in the same court again
DACK cases and judges can end up in the same court again

The High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) has recommended transferring 6 judges of the liquidated DACK to the Kyiv District Administrative Court (KDAC). All the cases of the liquidated DACK had previously been transferred to the KDAC as well. In other words, the nameplate has changed, but...

Special by topic
To the section
Failures of the Council of Judges
Judicial reform roadmap
Who are judges of the Constitutional Court and why they do not protect the Constitution?