The European Commission expects Ukraine to reform the Supreme Court and overhaul the bar bodies - B3165
Back

The European Commission expects Ukraine to reform the Supreme Court and overhaul the bar bodies

The European Commission has reiterated its expectation that Ukraine must cleanse the Supreme Court. This demand is highlighted in the Commission’s latest report. Over a year ago, following the scandal involving Vsevolod Knyazev, the European Commission emphasized the need to address corruption risks within the Supreme Court. However, no significant changes have been made since then.

The report also underscores the lack of progress in reforming Ukraine’s bar. The Commission expects a complete overhaul of the governing bodies of the bar, particularly the Ukrainian National Bar Association, through a transparent selection process. In addition, issues related to lawyer qualifications, entry into the profession, and other critical matters need to be addressed.

Legal education reform was also highlighted. While progress in this area was acknowledged, the European Commission stressed the need to tackle key priorities: delineating legal education and training law enforcement professionals and continuing to strengthen and unify standards for legal education and admission procedures.

European partners have also emphasised the need to enhance the capacity and effectiveness of the Public Integrity Council (PIC), including expanding access to information. The PIC itself has called for “full access to judicial dossiers (including candidate dossiers for judicial positions).”

Ukraine’s progress in judicial reform will ultimately determine whether its European integration leads to genuine change sought by the people or remains superficial window dressing. For more details on the necessary steps, refer to the Judicial Reform Roadmap.

Other news
To the section
The Committee recommended adopting an even worse draft law than the one criticised by the Venice Commission
The Committee recommended adopting an even worse draft law than the one criticised by the Venice Commission

On 30 September, the Verkhovna Rada Committee on Legal Policy recommended that Parliament adopt, as a basis, draft law No. 16018 on competitions for the High Qualifications Commission of Judges and the High Council of Justice. The authors of the draft law are Volodymyr Vatras, Ivan Kalaur and Mykola...

Venice Commission has criticised the government’s model of selection to the HQCJ
Venice Commission has criticised the government’s model of selection to the HQCJ

The High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) selects candidates for judicial positions and evaluates sitting judges. Its decisions determine who will work in Ukrainian courts. That is why it is crucial who selects the members of the HQCJ itself, and under what rules. In 2027, almost the entir...

€286 million for a “reform” that helps judges avoid accountability?
€286 million for a “reform” that helps judges avoid accountability?

The EU is about to pay Ukraine €3 billion for 10 implemented reforms. One of them is an updated review of judges’ integrity declarations. That one alone carries a payment of €286 million. According to European Pravda, the European Commission is proposing to disburse the funds to Ukraine un...

Special by topic
To the section
Supreme Court Unmasked: Corruption, Opposing Reforms and Russian Passports
Judicial reform roadmap
Problems of Legal Education and Ways to Resolve Them