The G7 Ambassadors called members of the High Council of Justice for transparency when appointing 16 (!) members of the High Council of Justice - 2440B
Back

The G7 Ambassadors called members of the High Council of Justice for transparency when appointing 16 (!) members of the High Council of Justice

The G7 Ambassadors call the members of the High Council of Justice for transparency when deciding on the appointment of 16 (!) members of the High Council of Justice. They announced this on their Twitter page. The G7 Ambassadors reaffirmed their support while stressing the importance of a transparent and open way of conducting the remaining selection rounds.

Last week, the HCJ published the methodology for selecting members of the High Qualification Commission of Judges. Currently, it provides for closed interviews (no online broadcast) and secret voting of members of the HCJ. Earlier, the Head of the High Council of Justice, Hryhoriy Usyk, stated at a press conference (time code 37:07) that the HCJ can appoint the operational HQCJ: “As for the possible options, there are many of them. Both the appointment of eight candidates from among judges and the appointment of a smaller number. In any case, I did not say a single word about the non-operational composition of the HQCJ”.

Other news
To the section
New rules bring new risks. What the draft law on the selection of HCJ members changes
New rules bring new risks. What the draft law on the selection of HCJ members changes

The government’s draft law submitted to the Venice Commission for consideration, in addition to a new procedure for forming the HQCJ, also substantially changes the procedures for electing (appointing) members of the High Council of Justice (HCJ). The proposed changes may create new risks for...

The government proposes a “broken bicycle” for international experts in the commission selecting HQCJ members
The government proposes a “broken bicycle” for international experts in the commission selecting HQCJ members

The High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) is a body that can recommend a person for the position of judge or recommend their dismissal. That is, whoever decides your case, should you suddenly have to go to court, depends on the HQCJ’s assessment. Judges over judges, so to speak. Logi...

DACK cases and judges can end up in the same court again
DACK cases and judges can end up in the same court again

The High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) has recommended transferring 6 judges of the liquidated DACK to the Kyiv District Administrative Court (KDAC). All the cases of the liquidated DACK had previously been transferred to the KDAC as well. In other words, the nameplate has changed, but...

Special by topic
To the section
Bar Reform Roadmap
Supreme Court Unmasked: Corruption, Opposing Reforms and Russian Passports
Judicial Reform Roadmap