The Kniaziev case: Supreme Court judges Hryhoriieva and Zheleznyi receive bail - F2BD7
Back

The Kniaziev case: Supreme Court judges Hryhoriieva and Zheleznyi receive bail

The High Anti-Corruption Court (HACC) has imposed a preventive measure in the form of bail on Supreme Court judges Iryna Hryhoriieva and Ihor Zheleznyi. For Hryhoriieva — UAH 2.5 million, and for Zheleznyi — UAH 2 million. A number of procedural obligations have also been placed on them.

Both judges are suspected of having conspired with former Supreme Court Chief Justice Vsevolod Kniaziev in May 2023 to accept a bribe from oligarch Kostiantyn Zhevaho in exchange for ruling in his favour.

In 2023, during searches, NABU detectives found marked banknotes on the judges. On Hryhoriieva — $50,000, on Zheleznyi — $10,000.

At today’s HACC hearing, the prosecutor emphasised that the investigation materials, including covert investigative measures, document the circumstances of the bribe’s transfer and distribution. Hryhoriieva’s defence claims that the $50,000 received from Kniaziev was a loan. The prosecutor, however, stated that during questioning on May 14, Kniaziev confirmed that offers of improper benefit had come from Zhevaho, and that the funds received were distributed among the judges of the Grand Chamber, including Hryhoriieva.

This story once again demonstrates that without genuine reform of the Supreme Court, corruption risks will not disappear. This requires two steps involving international experts with a decisive vote. First — a review of the integrity declarations of current Supreme Court judges. Second — the selection of judges for vacant positions in the Supreme Court.

Additionally, the High Council of Justice has had a disciplinary case open for two years against Iryna Hryhoriieva and Zhanna Yelenina. Yelenina also received a notice of suspicion from NABU and the Specialised Anti-Corruption Prosecutor’s Office in the Zhevaho bribery case. Yet there has been no real movement at the HCJ to date.

In April 2026, our lawyers filed a complaint with the HCJ regarding Ihor Zheleznyi as well. However, disciplinary inspector Zaika did not even designate it as a priority. We hope that the issuance of suspicion notices will finally compel the HCJ to move forward on these cases — and, along with them, on the reform of the Supreme Court, which the authorities, despite their commitments to the EU, continue to resist.

Other news
To the section
The Committee recommended adopting an even worse draft law than the one criticised by the Venice Commission
The Committee recommended adopting an even worse draft law than the one criticised by the Venice Commission

On 30 September, the Verkhovna Rada Committee on Legal Policy recommended that Parliament adopt, as a basis, draft law No. 16018 on competitions for the High Qualifications Commission of Judges and the High Council of Justice. The authors of the draft law are Volodymyr Vatras, Ivan Kalaur and Mykola...

Venice Commission has criticised the government’s model of selection to the HQCJ
Venice Commission has criticised the government’s model of selection to the HQCJ

The High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) selects candidates for judicial positions and evaluates sitting judges. Its decisions determine who will work in Ukrainian courts. That is why it is crucial who selects the members of the HQCJ itself, and under what rules. In 2027, almost the entir...

€286 million for a “reform” that helps judges avoid accountability?
€286 million for a “reform” that helps judges avoid accountability?

The EU is about to pay Ukraine €3 billion for 10 implemented reforms. One of them is an updated review of judges’ integrity declarations. That one alone carries a payment of €286 million. According to European Pravda, the European Commission is proposing to disburse the funds to Ukraine un...

Special by topic
To the section
Supreme Court Unmasked: Corruption, Opposing Reforms and Russian Passports
Judicial reform roadmap