The Kniaziev case: Supreme Court judges Hryhoriieva and Zheleznyi receive bail - 41C3D
Back

The Kniaziev case: Supreme Court judges Hryhoriieva and Zheleznyi receive bail

The High Anti-Corruption Court (HACC) has imposed a preventive measure in the form of bail on Supreme Court judges Iryna Hryhoriieva and Ihor Zheleznyi. For Hryhoriieva — UAH 2.5 million, and for Zheleznyi — UAH 2 million. A number of procedural obligations have also been placed on them.

Both judges are suspected of having conspired with former Supreme Court Chief Justice Vsevolod Kniaziev in May 2023 to accept a bribe from oligarch Kostiantyn Zhevaho in exchange for ruling in his favour.

In 2023, during searches, NABU detectives found marked banknotes on the judges. On Hryhoriieva — $50,000, on Zheleznyi — $10,000.

At today’s HACC hearing, the prosecutor emphasised that the investigation materials, including covert investigative measures, document the circumstances of the bribe’s transfer and distribution. Hryhoriieva’s defence claims that the $50,000 received from Kniaziev was a loan. The prosecutor, however, stated that during questioning on May 14, Kniaziev confirmed that offers of improper benefit had come from Zhevaho, and that the funds received were distributed among the judges of the Grand Chamber, including Hryhoriieva.

This story once again demonstrates that without genuine reform of the Supreme Court, corruption risks will not disappear. This requires two steps involving international experts with a decisive vote. First — a review of the integrity declarations of current Supreme Court judges. Second — the selection of judges for vacant positions in the Supreme Court.

Additionally, the High Council of Justice has had a disciplinary case open for two years against Iryna Hryhoriieva and Zhanna Yelenina. Yelenina also received a notice of suspicion from NABU and the Specialised Anti-Corruption Prosecutor’s Office in the Zhevaho bribery case. Yet there has been no real movement at the HCJ to date.

In April 2026, our lawyers filed a complaint with the HCJ regarding Ihor Zheleznyi as well. However, disciplinary inspector Zaika did not even designate it as a priority. We hope that the issuance of suspicion notices will finally compel the HCJ to move forward on these cases — and, along with them, on the reform of the Supreme Court, which the authorities, despite their commitments to the EU, continue to resist.

Other news
To the section
€286 million for a “reform” that helps judges avoid accountability?
€286 million for a “reform” that helps judges avoid accountability?

The EU is about to pay Ukraine €3 billion for 10 implemented reforms. One of them is an updated review of judges’ integrity declarations. That one alone carries a payment of €286 million. According to European Pravda, the European Commission is proposing to disburse the funds to Ukraine un...

Supreme Court Plenum initiates a competition for more than 50 vacant positions
Supreme Court Plenum initiates a competition for more than 50 vacant positions

The Plenum of the Supreme Court (SC) is considering an application to the High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) to announce a competition for vacant positions. There are currently more than 50 vacancies. Filling all vacancies at the Supreme Court after the competition procedure has been im...

Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court overturns the dismissal of the “coffee-loving judges” from the court of appeal
Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court overturns the dismissal of the “coffee-loving judges” from the court of appeal

The Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court (GC SC) has overturned the decision of the High Council of Justice (HCJ) in the case of Kyiv Court of Appeal judges Ihor Palenyk, Yurii Slyva and Viktor Hlynianyi. These are the same judges from the story about a USD 35,000 bribe, where the money was found in&h...

Special by topic
To the section
Supreme Court Unmasked: Corruption, Opposing Reforms and Russian Passports
Judicial reform roadmap