The MPs will resume the consideration of disciplinary complaints against judges, but they intend to sabotage the competition for the SDI - 23EB8
Back

The MPs will resume the consideration of disciplinary complaints against judges, but they intend to sabotage the competition for the SDI

Читати українською.

Tomorrow, the MPs can finally start the consideration of disciplinary complaints against judges. They are planning to vote on draft law No. 9261, which, in particular, proposes to provide the High Council of Justice with the opportunity to consider complaints as soon as the law on transparent competition for the Service of Disciplinary Inspectors is adopted.

According to our information, the MPs plan to remove this provision from the draft law during consideration in the session hall. However, this version, which was approved by the Committee, is optimal in the conditions when it is necessary to start considering complaints and to develop the capacity of judicial governance bodies, in particular, to form the SDI through transparent competition. Therefore, we urge the MPs to adopt the draft law in its current version. Now in more detail:

The consideration of complaints was stopped on August 5, 2021, when law No. 1635-IX on the reform of the HCJ entered into force. And although the body was reformed and is now operational, the HCJ cannot perform its main function without disciplinary inspectors. The SDI is the “first point of contact” for disciplinary complaints against judges. The inspectors should verify the complaint, search for information and prepare a draft decision for the members of the HCJ on the presence or absence of violations. Currently, draft law No. 9483-2 on the launch of SDI was registered in the Verkhovna Rada and was recommended by the Parliamentary Legal Committee. However, the formation of SDI with transparent competitive procedures takes time. In conditions where almost 9,000 disciplinary complaints against judges have accumulated, and some of them are actively trying to “escape” into retirement, disciplinary proceedings are urgently needed right now.

Therefore, draft law No. 9261 offers a temporary solution by restoring the disciplinary function of the HCJ while the SDI has not yet become operational. The HCJ will be able to independently consider complaints from the moment when the draft law on the SDI is adopted. Therefore, it is important that the MPs vote on the draft law in the current version.

Other news
To the section
New rules bring new risks. What the draft law on the selection of HCJ members changes
New rules bring new risks. What the draft law on the selection of HCJ members changes

The government’s draft law submitted to the Venice Commission for consideration, in addition to a new procedure for forming the HQCJ, also substantially changes the procedures for electing (appointing) members of the High Council of Justice (HCJ). The proposed changes may create new risks for...

The government proposes a “broken bicycle” for international experts in the commission selecting HQCJ members
The government proposes a “broken bicycle” for international experts in the commission selecting HQCJ members

The High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) is a body that can recommend a person for the position of judge or recommend their dismissal. That is, whoever decides your case, should you suddenly have to go to court, depends on the HQCJ’s assessment. Judges over judges, so to speak. Logi...

DACK cases and judges can end up in the same court again
DACK cases and judges can end up in the same court again

The High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) has recommended transferring 6 judges of the liquidated DACK to the Kyiv District Administrative Court (KDAC). All the cases of the liquidated DACK had previously been transferred to the KDAC as well. In other words, the nameplate has changed, but...

Special by topic
To the section
THE “REBOOTED” HIGH COUNCIL OF JUSTICE:WINS AND FAILS
Judicial reform roadmap