The Parliament adopted draft law No. 9322 in the first reading: will the reform of the CCU be failed? - F14CD
Back

The Parliament adopted draft law No. 9322 in the first reading: will the reform of the CCU be failed?

Читати українською.

Today, draft law No. 9322, foreseeing changes to the procedure for the selection of judges of the Constitutional Court, underwent its first reading in Parliament. However, it still contains serious flaws. For further details regarding these flaws, please refer to the following link.

Will the reform of the CCU happen?

On June 10, the draft law was approved only in the first reading. Further steps include finalisation and subsequent second reading, during which it may be adopted as a basis and as a whole. We urge the MPs not to ignore the dubious provisions and finalise the draft law considering the reservations expressed by the public and the recommendations put forth by the Venice Commission.

The following amendments should be introduced before the second reading:

  • Eliminate the provision regarding rating voting on candidates. All applicants endorsed by the Advisory Group of Experts should have an equal opportunity for selection.
  • Provide for the impossibility of appealing the results of the competition only on formal grounds.
Other news
To the section
New rules bring new risks. What the draft law on the selection of HCJ members changes
New rules bring new risks. What the draft law on the selection of HCJ members changes

The government’s draft law submitted to the Venice Commission for consideration, in addition to a new procedure for forming the HQCJ, also substantially changes the procedures for electing (appointing) members of the High Council of Justice (HCJ). The proposed changes may create new risks for...

The government proposes a “broken bicycle” for international experts in the commission selecting HQCJ members
The government proposes a “broken bicycle” for international experts in the commission selecting HQCJ members

The High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) is a body that can recommend a person for the position of judge or recommend their dismissal. That is, whoever decides your case, should you suddenly have to go to court, depends on the HQCJ’s assessment. Judges over judges, so to speak. Logi...

DACK cases and judges can end up in the same court again
DACK cases and judges can end up in the same court again

The High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) has recommended transferring 6 judges of the liquidated DACK to the Kyiv District Administrative Court (KDAC). All the cases of the liquidated DACK had previously been transferred to the KDAC as well. In other words, the nameplate has changed, but...

Special by topic
To the section
Judicial reform roadmap
Who are judges of the Constitutional Court and why they do not protect the Constitution?