The Supreme Court is dragging its feet. Vovk has not been saved — yet - 17F4A
Back

The Supreme Court is dragging its feet. Vovk has not been saved — yet

The worst has not happened. However, the threat has not disappeared — it has merely been postponed.

The Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court has already postponed its decision for the fourth time in the case where the scandalous Pavlo Vovk is challenging his dismissal as a judge. This time, the hearing has been rescheduled for June 18 at 10:00.

It is precisely due to the engagement of civil society that the Supreme Court is hesitant to rule in Vovk’s favour. At the same time, the judges are unwilling to state the obvious — that Vovk has no place among judges given his blatant misconduct.

In cases like this, the attention of both the public and international partners is crucial. Today, representatives of five EU diplomatic missions attended the hearing. Court staff attempted to deny them access, but ultimately failed. Others were less fortunate. Despite available seats in the courtroom, several journalists and concerned citizens were denied entry to the Supreme Court premises. Among them was Slidstvo.Info journalist Liza Bykova, who previously published an investigation into Pavlo Vovk’s daughter and her provocations. Journalists from the independent outlet Graty, which covers court proceedings, were also left outside, along with activists from the NGO Holka led by Iryna Fedoriv. This once again demonstrates the selective approach of the Supreme Court — particularly given that, during the consideration of Inna Otrosh’s case, court staff were bringing in extra chairs to accommodate her supporters.

We thank everyone who helped spread the word and those who came to the hearing in person. Your attention is what prevents the system from sliding back into the hands of corrupt judges. The reinstatement of Pavlo Vovk would trigger the return of at least 50 other low-integrity judges and make it virtually impossible to dismiss judges in the future — even those caught committing crimes.

We will continue to actively cover this issue. See you on June 18.

Other news
To the section
The Committee recommended adopting an even worse draft law than the one criticised by the Venice Commission
The Committee recommended adopting an even worse draft law than the one criticised by the Venice Commission

On 30 September, the Verkhovna Rada Committee on Legal Policy recommended that Parliament adopt, as a basis, draft law No. 16018 on competitions for the High Qualifications Commission of Judges and the High Council of Justice. The authors of the draft law are Volodymyr Vatras, Ivan Kalaur and Mykola...

Venice Commission has criticised the government’s model of selection to the HQCJ
Venice Commission has criticised the government’s model of selection to the HQCJ

The High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) selects candidates for judicial positions and evaluates sitting judges. Its decisions determine who will work in Ukrainian courts. That is why it is crucial who selects the members of the HQCJ itself, and under what rules. In 2027, almost the entir...

€286 million for a “reform” that helps judges avoid accountability?
€286 million for a “reform” that helps judges avoid accountability?

The EU is about to pay Ukraine €3 billion for 10 implemented reforms. One of them is an updated review of judges’ integrity declarations. That one alone carries a payment of €286 million. According to European Pravda, the European Commission is proposing to disburse the funds to Ukraine un...

Special by topic
To the section
Supreme Court Unmasked: Corruption, Opposing Reforms and Russian Passports
Judicial reform roadmap