Two current MPs from the “Servant of the People” are candidates for the Constitutional Court. This violates the Constitution - A6037
Back

Two current MPs from the “Servant of the People” are candidates for the Constitutional Court. This violates the Constitution

The Parliament announced candidates for the post of judge of the Constitutional Court (CCU) under its quota.

It seems that the authorities are in no hurry to stop the practice of political bias of judges, which is the main source of problems in the Constitutional Court: the list includes two MPs from “Servant of the People”, Oleksandr Kopylenko, deputy head of the Committee on Foreign Policy, and Pavlo Pavlish, deputy head of the Legal Committee. This violates the requirement of the Constitution for the political independence of judges of the Constitutional Court, which is laid down in Article 148.

Of note is MP Pavlish’s involvement in proposing several contentious draft laws. In March of this year, he advocated for limiting access to the court register (No. 7033-д) and withholding the recording of court hearings (No. 8359). His latest draft law, No. 9643-1, introduces new mechanisms for control and political influence over the Supreme Court, as analysed here.

This politicisation of the CCU is not an isolated incident. Last year, despite constitutional and Venice Commission objections, the Verkhovna Rada appointed its “Servant of the People” MP, Olga Sovhyria, as a Constitutional Court judge. At that time, she was a member of the same Legal Committee.

Obviously, the authorities have recognised the success of this approach and persist in its implementation. The associated risks of further politicising the Constitutional Court are considerable—ranging from approving elections during times of war to potentially overturning crucial European integration reforms, as witnessed in 2020.

A notable difference in the current scenario is the involvement of the Advisory Group of Experts, which includes international experts, in the preliminary selection of candidates. The risks associated with its formation are outlined here. Thus, there will be an opportunity to check how effective the mechanism is.

There are also decent candidates on the list. We hope that a person who meets the criteria of political independence, integrity and high professional skills will be appointed to the CCU.

Other news
To the section
€286 million for a “reform” that helps judges avoid accountability?
€286 million for a “reform” that helps judges avoid accountability?

The EU is about to pay Ukraine €3 billion for 10 implemented reforms. One of them is an updated review of judges’ integrity declarations. That one alone carries a payment of €286 million. According to European Pravda, the European Commission is proposing to disburse the funds to Ukraine un...

Supreme Court Plenum initiates a competition for more than 50 vacant positions
Supreme Court Plenum initiates a competition for more than 50 vacant positions

The Plenum of the Supreme Court (SC) is considering an application to the High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) to announce a competition for vacant positions. There are currently more than 50 vacancies. Filling all vacancies at the Supreme Court after the competition procedure has been im...

Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court overturns the dismissal of the “coffee-loving judges” from the court of appeal
Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court overturns the dismissal of the “coffee-loving judges” from the court of appeal

The Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court (GC SC) has overturned the decision of the High Council of Justice (HCJ) in the case of Kyiv Court of Appeal judges Ihor Palenyk, Yurii Slyva and Viktor Hlynianyi. These are the same judges from the story about a USD 35,000 bribe, where the money was found in&h...

Special by topic
To the section
Bar Reform Roadmap
Supreme Court Unmasked: Corruption, Opposing Reforms and Russian Passports
Judicial Reform Roadmap