Ukrainians trust public and international experts rather than judges to select judges – the survey - B38AC
Back

Ukrainians trust public and international experts rather than judges to select judges – the survey

Almost half of Ukrainians surveyed believe that judges should be selected by independent public experts – investigative journalists and other civil society representatives. Slightly less than 30% assign this role to independent international experts. Ukrainians expressed the least confidence in the selection of judges to judges and politicians themselves.

This is shown by a study conducted by the Ilko Kucheriv Democratic Initiatives Foundation together with the Razumkov Center’s sociological service at the request of the DEJURE Foundation on August 3 to 9, 2021.

Ukrainians trust public and international experts rather than judges to select judges – the survey - D1F61

“This result shows, first of all, how important public participation is in the selection of candidates for positions in courts and judicial authorities. We hope that the competition for the HQCJ and the HCJ reform will start soon, and we urge all investigative journalists and civil society activists who have covered the cases of judges of low integrity for years to get involved in the process and inform/remind the general public as well as the Selection Commission to the HQCJ and the Ethics Council of the HCJ about the findings.”

-says Mykhailo Zhernakov, Chair of the Board of the DEJURE Foundation.

The top five reasons for citizens’ distrust of the courts include corruption (78%), the dependence of judges on oligarchs (51.3%), paid court decisions (46.2%), mutual cover-up in the judiciary (43.3%). and dependence on politicians (41.8%).

Ukrainians trust public and international experts rather than judges to select judges – the survey - 9CF74

In the meantime, more than 50% of Ukrainians support the liquidation of the District Administrative Court of Kyiv, headed by judge Pavlo Vovk, who is suspected of forming a criminal group and seizing power.

The study was conducted by the Ilko Kucheriv Democratic Initiatives Foundation together with the Razumkov Centre’s sociological service from August 3 to 9, 2021 in all regions of Ukraine except the occupied territories. The error does not exceed 2.3%.

The study was conducted with the financial support of the International Renaissance Foundation and the Embassy of Sweden in Ukraine. The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of the DEJURE Foundation and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the Foundation or the Embassy.

Other news
To the section
The Committee recommended adopting an even worse draft law than the one criticised by the Venice Commission
The Committee recommended adopting an even worse draft law than the one criticised by the Venice Commission

On 30 September, the Verkhovna Rada Committee on Legal Policy recommended that Parliament adopt, as a basis, draft law No. 16018 on competitions for the High Qualifications Commission of Judges and the High Council of Justice. The authors of the draft law are Volodymyr Vatras, Ivan Kalaur and Mykola...

Venice Commission has criticised the government’s model of selection to the HQCJ
Venice Commission has criticised the government’s model of selection to the HQCJ

The High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) selects candidates for judicial positions and evaluates sitting judges. Its decisions determine who will work in Ukrainian courts. That is why it is crucial who selects the members of the HQCJ itself, and under what rules. In 2027, almost the entir...

Izovitova is concealing the decision that has allowed her to lead the attorney profession for 14 years
Izovitova is concealing the decision that has allowed her to lead the attorney profession for 14 years

On the left in the image is Serhii Osyka, an attorney and member of the Bar Council of Ukraine (BCU). In 2022, he took part in adopting the BCU decision that allows Medvedchuk’s associate Lidiia Izovitova to avoid elections within the attorney profession and to lead it for the 14th year now. Izovi...

Special by topic
To the section
THE “REBOOTED” HIGH COUNCIL OF JUSTICE:WINS AND FAILS
HQCJ:Accomplishments and Problems
Judicial reform roadmap