Ukrainians trust public and international experts rather than judges to select judges – the survey - 479F1
Back

Ukrainians trust public and international experts rather than judges to select judges – the survey

Almost half of Ukrainians surveyed believe that judges should be selected by independent public experts – investigative journalists and other civil society representatives. Slightly less than 30% assign this role to independent international experts. Ukrainians expressed the least confidence in the selection of judges to judges and politicians themselves.

This is shown by a study conducted by the Ilko Kucheriv Democratic Initiatives Foundation together with the Razumkov Center’s sociological service at the request of the DEJURE Foundation on August 3 to 9, 2021.

Ukrainians trust public and international experts rather than judges to select judges – the survey - B46BD

“This result shows, first of all, how important public participation is in the selection of candidates for positions in courts and judicial authorities. We hope that the competition for the HQCJ and the HCJ reform will start soon, and we urge all investigative journalists and civil society activists who have covered the cases of judges of low integrity for years to get involved in the process and inform/remind the general public as well as the Selection Commission to the HQCJ and the Ethics Council of the HCJ about the findings.”

-says Mykhailo Zhernakov, Chair of the Board of the DEJURE Foundation.

The top five reasons for citizens’ distrust of the courts include corruption (78%), the dependence of judges on oligarchs (51.3%), paid court decisions (46.2%), mutual cover-up in the judiciary (43.3%). and dependence on politicians (41.8%).

Ukrainians trust public and international experts rather than judges to select judges – the survey - 55F38

In the meantime, more than 50% of Ukrainians support the liquidation of the District Administrative Court of Kyiv, headed by judge Pavlo Vovk, who is suspected of forming a criminal group and seizing power.

The study was conducted by the Ilko Kucheriv Democratic Initiatives Foundation together with the Razumkov Centre’s sociological service from August 3 to 9, 2021 in all regions of Ukraine except the occupied territories. The error does not exceed 2.3%.

The study was conducted with the financial support of the International Renaissance Foundation and the Embassy of Sweden in Ukraine. The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of the DEJURE Foundation and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the Foundation or the Embassy.

Other news
To the section
€286 million for a “reform” that helps judges avoid accountability?
€286 million for a “reform” that helps judges avoid accountability?

The EU is about to pay Ukraine €3 billion for 10 implemented reforms. One of them is an updated review of judges’ integrity declarations. That one alone carries a payment of €286 million. According to European Pravda, the European Commission is proposing to disburse the funds to Ukraine un...

Supreme Court Plenum initiates a competition for more than 50 vacant positions
Supreme Court Plenum initiates a competition for more than 50 vacant positions

The Plenum of the Supreme Court (SC) is considering an application to the High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) to announce a competition for vacant positions. There are currently more than 50 vacancies. Filling all vacancies at the Supreme Court after the competition procedure has been im...

Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court overturns the dismissal of the “coffee-loving judges” from the court of appeal
Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court overturns the dismissal of the “coffee-loving judges” from the court of appeal

The Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court (GC SC) has overturned the decision of the High Council of Justice (HCJ) in the case of Kyiv Court of Appeal judges Ihor Palenyk, Yurii Slyva and Viktor Hlynianyi. These are the same judges from the story about a USD 35,000 bribe, where the money was found in&h...

Special by topic
To the section
THE “REBOOTED” HIGH COUNCIL OF JUSTICE:WINS AND FAILS
HQCJ:Accomplishments and Problems
Judicial reform roadmap