Verkhovna Rada Attempts to Undermine Public Oversight - D381A
Back

Verkhovna Rada Attempts to Undermine Public Oversight

Today, the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine is set to consider two draft laws — No. 7033-d and No. 11533 — which could restrict access to judicial registry decisions and data on property locations. This would obstruct journalists from exposing corrupt individuals, hinder the public from assessing the integrity of candidates for various positions, and prevent ordinary citizens from verifying property owners before making purchases.

Draft Law No. 7033-д:

  • Limits access to information and decisions in the judicial registry. Civil society previously called for the draft law to be rejected, and it was sent back for revision by the Parliamentary Committee on Legal Policy. However, based on our information, even after revisions, the draft still contains disproportionate restrictions.
  • Proposes to conceal court decisions related to conscription and mobilization (Articles 336–336-2 of the Criminal Code), as well as lawsuits filed by Territorial Recruitment Centers (TRCs) seeking to suspend individuals’ driving rights during martial law and for one year afterward. How such rulings threaten national security remains unclear.
  • Grants judges the discretion to redact information from court rulings that they believe “may endanger security” — even in cases heard in open court. This significantly increases corruption risks, as it would allow judges to hide virtually any information under the pretext of “security concerns.”

Draft Law No. 11533:

  • Proposes to restrict access to data on property locations and cadastral numbers of land plots for the duration of martial law and one year beyond. If passed, users will only be able to see the country or administrative center where the property is located — nothing more. This threatens public oversight and investigative journalism aimed at exposing corruption.

DEJURE Foundation has already appealed to the National Agency on Corruption Prevention (NACP), requesting an anti-corruption review of the draft. As it turns out, no such review has been conducted.

We call on Members of Parliament to prevent the adoption of these harmful provisions.

Other news
To the section
The Committee recommended adopting an even worse draft law than the one criticised by the Venice Commission
The Committee recommended adopting an even worse draft law than the one criticised by the Venice Commission

On 30 September, the Verkhovna Rada Committee on Legal Policy recommended that Parliament adopt, as a basis, draft law No. 16018 on competitions for the High Qualifications Commission of Judges and the High Council of Justice. The authors of the draft law are Volodymyr Vatras, Ivan Kalaur and Mykola...

Venice Commission has criticised the government’s model of selection to the HQCJ
Venice Commission has criticised the government’s model of selection to the HQCJ

The High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) selects candidates for judicial positions and evaluates sitting judges. Its decisions determine who will work in Ukrainian courts. That is why it is crucial who selects the members of the HQCJ itself, and under what rules. In 2027, almost the entir...

Izovitova is concealing the decision that has allowed her to lead the attorney profession for 14 years
Izovitova is concealing the decision that has allowed her to lead the attorney profession for 14 years

On the left in the image is Serhii Osyka, an attorney and member of the Bar Council of Ukraine (BCU). In 2022, he took part in adopting the BCU decision that allows Medvedchuk’s associate Lidiia Izovitova to avoid elections within the attorney profession and to lead it for the 14th year now. Izovi...

Special by topic
To the section
Bar Reform Roadmap
Supreme Court Unmasked: Corruption, Opposing Reforms and Russian Passports
Judicial Reform Roadmap