Ukrainian CSOs call EU member states to grant Ukraine EU candidate status promptly, as recognition of joint reform achievements - D3691
Back

Ukrainian CSOs call EU member states to grant Ukraine EU candidate status promptly, as recognition of joint reform achievements

Ukrainian civil society organizations call on European Union member states to grant Ukraine EU candidate status in June, without any delays, conditionalities, and possible reformulations. This will be a decisive recognition of Ukraine’s continuous reform achievements endorsed by the EU, as well as a powerful gesture of support to the people of Ukraine, who are now defending freedom and democracy on the frontline. This is especially important, given that Ukraine’s accession to the EU is supported by 91% of Ukrainians and 66% of EU member state citizens.

Ukraine’s ambitious reforms agenda was started in 2014 after Ukrainians took to the streets under EU flags to protest the refusal by the former pro-Russian government to sign the Association Agreement with the EU. Since then, tens of thousands of Ukrainians gave their lives to defend Ukraine’s civilizational choice, first at the Maydan, then during the Russian war in Donbas, and now during the large-scale invasion.

Despite challenges, over eight years Ukraine managed to achieve significant progress in democracy building, serving as a testing ground for innovative solutions for deep-rooted problems such as corruption. The unique Ukrainian experience can be implemented in other countries seeking solutions to problems of justice and rule of law.

In particular, a big number of transparency tools have been introduced in Ukraine. They include the electronic income and asset declaration system for public officials and the electronic reporting about assets and income of political parties. The public procurements system was transformed into an award-winning online auction system, ProZorro. Information of high interest to the public, such as state registries and beneficiaries of legal entities was open.

The entire anti-corruption infrastructure was built from scratch. This includes the National Anti-Corruption Bureau, the Specialized Anti-Corruption Prosecution, the High Anti-Corruption Court, the National Agency for Corruption Prevention, and the Asset Recovery and Management Agency. More than 800 cases of high-profile corruption are being investigated and 72 verdicts have been made by the court so far. The new agencies continue to operate and deliver results even during wartime. For example, since February 24, around $15,3 million (447,3 million UAH) were directed from bails and seized assets in the high-profile corruption cases to the needs of the Ukrainian Armed Forces. 

Moreover, the long-overdue and promising judicial reform was launched and is currently ongoing. This reform foresees the renewal of top judicial decision-making authorities with engagement of independent international experts. Now we are on the final stage of this reform. These days, international experts jointly with Ukrainian judges interview the pre-selected candidates, focusing on their integrity and independence. Importantly, Moldova is now implementing judicial reform following the Ukrainian model.   

Since 2014 when the EU-Ukraine Association Agreement was concluded, with overwhelming support from the EU, Ukraine has managed to achieve significant progress in the implementation of framework and sectoral reforms, namely decentralization, public administration, energy, digital, customs, environmental and public finance reforms.
Most of these reforms were drastically amplified through advocacy tools provided by the EU Visa Liberalization Plan, EU macro-financial assistance programs, the Association Agreement, IMF conditionalities, etc. 

Moreover, the wider impact of Ukrainian reforms was recognized by the Russian president Vladimir Putin. On February 21, just a few days before the full-scale attack by the Russian Federation against Ukraine, Putin explicitly named and criticized Ukrainian anti-corruption and rule of law reforms in his speech. With this statement, he confirmed that the successful democratization and our European and Euroatlantic choice are one of the key reasons why Russians aim to destroy our nation. 

Ukraine has already earned candidate status by implementing the reforms since 2014. Recognizing that more efforts in continuing fundamental reforms are required, we emphasize that it is exactly the EU candidate status and subsequent accession negotiations process that will be the most effective framework for further reforms promotion, giving Ukrainian civil society real advocacy leverages. 

We would also like to stress that the decision on Ukraine’s candidate status should be solely based on progress assessment within EU-Ukraine’s bilateral track and cannot be conditioned on the accession process of other countries. 
For the sake of future reforms in Ukraine, as well as in support of our joint efforts to bring victory, peace, stability, and prosperity to the whole region, we urge the EU to officially recognize Ukraine as a candidate country as soon as possible. 

Signatories: 
International Center for Ukrainian Victory 
Anti-corruption Action Center 
Transparency International Ukraine
DEJURE Foundation
All-Ukrainian Association “Automaidan”
Kharkiv Anticorruption Center
Center for Policy and Legal Reform 
Bihus.Info
Anti-Corruption Headquarters 
StateWatch
NAKO – the Independent Anti-Corruption Commission
ANTS Network 
New Europe Center
Europe Without Barriers
International Renaissance Foundation
Ukrainian Center for European Policy
Institute of Social and Economic Transformation 
Center for Civil Liberties
Centre for Global Studies Strategy XXI
Civil Network OPORA 
ICO Environment – People – Law 
Centre for Economic Strategy
Institute of legislative ideas 
CHESNO Movement
Center for Social and Economic Research – CASE Ukraine
Election Council UA
DIXI Group
Association Energy Efficient Cities of Ukraine
pro.mova
Center of Social Transformations
School for Policy Analysis NaUKMA
Agency for Legislative Initiatives
Ukrainian School of Political Studies
National Association of Cinematographers of Ukraine
Human Rights Center ZMINA
Save Dnipro / SaveEcoBot
Civil Control Platform

Other news
To the section
The Committee recommended adopting an even worse draft law than the one criticised by the Venice Commission
The Committee recommended adopting an even worse draft law than the one criticised by the Venice Commission

On 30 September, the Verkhovna Rada Committee on Legal Policy recommended that Parliament adopt, as a basis, draft law No. 16018 on competitions for the High Qualifications Commission of Judges and the High Council of Justice. The authors of the draft law are Volodymyr Vatras, Ivan Kalaur and Mykola...

Venice Commission has criticised the government’s model of selection to the HQCJ
Venice Commission has criticised the government’s model of selection to the HQCJ

The High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) selects candidates for judicial positions and evaluates sitting judges. Its decisions determine who will work in Ukrainian courts. That is why it is crucial who selects the members of the HQCJ itself, and under what rules. In 2027, almost the entir...

€286 million for a “reform” that helps judges avoid accountability?
€286 million for a “reform” that helps judges avoid accountability?

The EU is about to pay Ukraine €3 billion for 10 implemented reforms. One of them is an updated review of judges’ integrity declarations. That one alone carries a payment of €286 million. According to European Pravda, the European Commission is proposing to disburse the funds to Ukraine un...

Special by topic
To the section
Bar Reform Roadmap
Supreme Court Unmasked: Corruption, Opposing Reforms and Russian Passports
Judicial Reform Roadmap