We call on the MPs to exclude the provisions that jeopardise the Public Integrity Council from draft law No. 10140-д - 6D6DB
Back

We call on the MPs to exclude the provisions that jeopardise the Public Integrity Council from draft law No. 10140-д

Читати українською.

On November 21, draft law No. 10140-д passed its first reading in the Verkhovna Rada, posing a significant threat to the fundamental mechanism of public involvement in the assessment and selection of judges—the Public Integrity Council (PIC). The draft law proposes the complete removal of Article 87 from the “On the Judiciary and the Status of Judges” law, which governs PIC’s activities. Notably, the proposed changes include:

  • Provisions on the powers of the High Qualification Commission of Judges to terminate the powers of members of the Public Integrity Council, which may potentially lead to the formation of a dependent PIC.
  • The provision forbidding members of the PIC to make value judgments in their decisions makes the work of the body impossible, as any information from the PIC decision that applies the standard of reasonable doubt can be interpreted as a value judgment.
  • Restricting the PIC members from publicly assessing judges and defending their opinions, jeopardising the core principle of public oversight, where transparency is essential.

The completion of the qualification assessment and judge selection, involving PIC participation, is a crucial requirement outlined by the European Commission for initiating accession negotiations. If the draft law is adopted in its current form and the PIC undergoes drastic changes, meeting this condition becomes uncertain, jeopardising Ukraine’s European integration and potential financial support.

Therefore, the NGOs urge the MPs not to amend or eliminate Article 87 of the Law of Ukraine, “On the Judiciary and the Status of Judges,” which regulates the PIC activities.

The adoption of the proposed law would weaken public oversight of judge assessments, hinder the PIC’s participatory role, disrupt efforts to cleanse the judicial system, and result in a failure to meet international obligations.

Signed by:

  • DEJURE Foundation
  • Anti-Corruption Action Centre
  • Human Rights Centre ZMINA
  • Centre for Economic Strategy
  • NGO “Платформа Громадський Контроль”
  • CHESNO Movement
  • Institute of Legislative Ideas
  • Anti-Corruption Headquarters
  • Anti-corruption Research and Education Centre
  • StateWatch
  • Centre of Policy and Legal Reform
Other news
To the section
New rules bring new risks. What the draft law on the selection of HCJ members changes
New rules bring new risks. What the draft law on the selection of HCJ members changes

The government’s draft law submitted to the Venice Commission for consideration, in addition to a new procedure for forming the HQCJ, also substantially changes the procedures for electing (appointing) members of the High Council of Justice (HCJ). The proposed changes may create new risks for...

The government proposes a “broken bicycle” for international experts in the commission selecting HQCJ members
The government proposes a “broken bicycle” for international experts in the commission selecting HQCJ members

The High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) is a body that can recommend a person for the position of judge or recommend their dismissal. That is, whoever decides your case, should you suddenly have to go to court, depends on the HQCJ’s assessment. Judges over judges, so to speak. Logi...

DACK cases and judges can end up in the same court again
DACK cases and judges can end up in the same court again

The High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) has recommended transferring 6 judges of the liquidated DACK to the Kyiv District Administrative Court (KDAC). All the cases of the liquidated DACK had previously been transferred to the KDAC as well. In other words, the nameplate has changed, but...

Special by topic
To the section
HQCJ:Accomplishments and Problems
Judicial reform roadmap