We call on the MPs to exclude the provisions that jeopardise the Public Integrity Council from draft law No. 10140-д - C8492
Back

We call on the MPs to exclude the provisions that jeopardise the Public Integrity Council from draft law No. 10140-д

Читати українською.

On November 21, draft law No. 10140-д passed its first reading in the Verkhovna Rada, posing a significant threat to the fundamental mechanism of public involvement in the assessment and selection of judges—the Public Integrity Council (PIC). The draft law proposes the complete removal of Article 87 from the “On the Judiciary and the Status of Judges” law, which governs PIC’s activities. Notably, the proposed changes include:

  • Provisions on the powers of the High Qualification Commission of Judges to terminate the powers of members of the Public Integrity Council, which may potentially lead to the formation of a dependent PIC.
  • The provision forbidding members of the PIC to make value judgments in their decisions makes the work of the body impossible, as any information from the PIC decision that applies the standard of reasonable doubt can be interpreted as a value judgment.
  • Restricting the PIC members from publicly assessing judges and defending their opinions, jeopardising the core principle of public oversight, where transparency is essential.

The completion of the qualification assessment and judge selection, involving PIC participation, is a crucial requirement outlined by the European Commission for initiating accession negotiations. If the draft law is adopted in its current form and the PIC undergoes drastic changes, meeting this condition becomes uncertain, jeopardising Ukraine’s European integration and potential financial support.

Therefore, the NGOs urge the MPs not to amend or eliminate Article 87 of the Law of Ukraine, “On the Judiciary and the Status of Judges,” which regulates the PIC activities.

The adoption of the proposed law would weaken public oversight of judge assessments, hinder the PIC’s participatory role, disrupt efforts to cleanse the judicial system, and result in a failure to meet international obligations.

Signed by:

  • DEJURE Foundation
  • Anti-Corruption Action Centre
  • Human Rights Centre ZMINA
  • Centre for Economic Strategy
  • NGO “Платформа Громадський Контроль”
  • CHESNO Movement
  • Institute of Legislative Ideas
  • Anti-Corruption Headquarters
  • Anti-corruption Research and Education Centre
  • StateWatch
  • Centre of Policy and Legal Reform
Other news
To the section
€286 million for a “reform” that helps judges avoid accountability?
€286 million for a “reform” that helps judges avoid accountability?

The EU is about to pay Ukraine €3 billion for 10 implemented reforms. One of them is an updated review of judges’ integrity declarations. That one alone carries a payment of €286 million. According to European Pravda, the European Commission is proposing to disburse the funds to Ukraine un...

Supreme Court Plenum initiates a competition for more than 50 vacant positions
Supreme Court Plenum initiates a competition for more than 50 vacant positions

The Plenum of the Supreme Court (SC) is considering an application to the High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) to announce a competition for vacant positions. There are currently more than 50 vacancies. Filling all vacancies at the Supreme Court after the competition procedure has been im...

Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court overturns the dismissal of the “coffee-loving judges” from the court of appeal
Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court overturns the dismissal of the “coffee-loving judges” from the court of appeal

The Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court (GC SC) has overturned the decision of the High Council of Justice (HCJ) in the case of Kyiv Court of Appeal judges Ihor Palenyk, Yurii Slyva and Viktor Hlynianyi. These are the same judges from the story about a USD 35,000 bribe, where the money was found in&h...

Special by topic
To the section
HQCJ:Accomplishments and Problems
Judicial reform roadmap