The Venice Commission supported the decisive vote of international experts in the reform of the HCJ - 67C74
Back

The Venice Commission supported the decisive vote of international experts in the reform of the HCJ

This is stated in the opinion of the Venice Commission on the presidential draft law №5068 on the reform of the High Council of Justice, published on May 5.

The draft law provides for the creation of the Ethics Council – a body authorized to conduct a one-time assessment of current members of the HCJ and check the integrity of future candidates. The Ethics Council will include three current or former judges nominated by the Council of Judges, as well as three international experts with an impeccable reputation, nominated by international organizations.

Experts of the DEJURE Foundation have repeatedly called on the MPs to grant international experts a decisive vote in the Ethics Council. Otherwise, the judges will block both the dismissal of the HCJ members of low integrity and the selection of decent candidates.

In its opinion, the Venice Commission recommended that the Verkhovna Rada give a decisive vote to international experts.

The Commission proposes to apply an approach according to which a decision voted for by at least four members of the Ethics Council, two of whom are international experts, will be adopted. If the votes of the members of the Ethics Council are divided equally (2 by 2 or 3 by 3), the Council should hold an additional discussion and then vote again. If the votes are again split in half, the decision voted for by at least two international experts will be adopted.

“We welcome the decision of the Venice Commission to support the decisive vote of international experts in the selection of the HCJ members. This gives more chances that the long-awaited process of cleansing the judiciary will finally break the deadlock. In addition, the draft law now stipulates that the HCJ members of low integrity can only be dismissed by the appointing bodies: Congresses of judges, lawyers, prosecutors or academics, the Parliament, and the President. The Ethics Council must be able to do this on its own, otherwise, most HCJ members of low integrity will never be dismissed.”

– says Stepan Berko, Advocacy Manager of the DEJURE Foundation

Other news
To the section
The Committee recommended adopting an even worse draft law than the one criticised by the Venice Commission
The Committee recommended adopting an even worse draft law than the one criticised by the Venice Commission

On 30 September, the Verkhovna Rada Committee on Legal Policy recommended that Parliament adopt, as a basis, draft law No. 16018 on competitions for the High Qualifications Commission of Judges and the High Council of Justice. The authors of the draft law are Volodymyr Vatras, Ivan Kalaur and Mykola...

Venice Commission has criticised the government’s model of selection to the HQCJ
Venice Commission has criticised the government’s model of selection to the HQCJ

The High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) selects candidates for judicial positions and evaluates sitting judges. Its decisions determine who will work in Ukrainian courts. That is why it is crucial who selects the members of the HQCJ itself, and under what rules. In 2027, almost the entir...

€286 million for a “reform” that helps judges avoid accountability?
€286 million for a “reform” that helps judges avoid accountability?

The EU is about to pay Ukraine €3 billion for 10 implemented reforms. One of them is an updated review of judges’ integrity declarations. That one alone carries a payment of €286 million. According to European Pravda, the European Commission is proposing to disburse the funds to Ukraine un...

Special by topic
To the section
Bar Reform Roadmap
Supreme Court Unmasked: Corruption, Opposing Reforms and Russian Passports
Judicial Reform Roadmap