Competition for the Constitutional Court under the Congress of Judges’ quota — a lack of qualified candidates, again - 8266F
Back

Competition for the Constitutional Court under the Congress of Judges’ quota — a lack of qualified candidates, again

Another setback on the path to filling vacancies at the Constitutional Court of Ukraine: the Advisory Group of Experts has completed its assessment of the candidates’ professional competence and did not recommend either of the two candidates who had recently passed the integrity screening.

In other words, the Congress of Judges of Ukraine once again put forward a list of weak candidates who failed the competence assessment conducted by independent experts. Under such conditions, appointing judges to the two vacant CCU positions is almost impossible.

As a result, the competition has again reached a dead end, and the Constitutional Court remains understaffed: five positions are currently vacant—more than one third of the Court’s total composition. Simultaneously, another competition is underway for two positions under the quota of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, but this is insufficient to resolve the problem of understaffing.

An integrity-driven and professional composition of the Constitutional Court is a guarantee of human rights protection and one of the key conditions for Ukraine’s further European integration. Due to the premature termination of the selection under the Congress of Judges’ quota, a new competition must be held. DEJURE Foundation calls on integrity-driven and professional candidates to apply, so that the Constitutional Court can be promptly and fully staffed and effectively perform its constitutional role.

Other news
To the section
New rules bring new risks. What the draft law on the selection of HCJ members changes
New rules bring new risks. What the draft law on the selection of HCJ members changes

The government’s draft law submitted to the Venice Commission for consideration, in addition to a new procedure for forming the HQCJ, also substantially changes the procedures for electing (appointing) members of the High Council of Justice (HCJ). The proposed changes may create new risks for...

The government proposes a “broken bicycle” for international experts in the commission selecting HQCJ members
The government proposes a “broken bicycle” for international experts in the commission selecting HQCJ members

The High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) is a body that can recommend a person for the position of judge or recommend their dismissal. That is, whoever decides your case, should you suddenly have to go to court, depends on the HQCJ’s assessment. Judges over judges, so to speak. Logi...

DACK cases and judges can end up in the same court again
DACK cases and judges can end up in the same court again

The High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) has recommended transferring 6 judges of the liquidated DACK to the Kyiv District Administrative Court (KDAC). All the cases of the liquidated DACK had previously been transferred to the KDAC as well. In other words, the nameplate has changed, but...

Special by topic
To the section
Judicial reform roadmap
Who are judges of the Constitutional Court and why they do not protect the Constitution?