High Council of Justice 2.0: reboot (analysis of competitive selection for vacant positions and evaluation of the current members) - 4CBA7
Back
High Council of Justice 2.0: reboot (analysis of competitive selection for vacant positions and evaluation of the current members)

High Council of Justice 2.0: reboot (analysis of competitive selection for vacant positions and evaluation of the current members)

Читати українською.

This report analyzes the HCJ reboot process:

● formation of the Ethics Council,
● operations of the Ethics Council in assessing compliance with the criteria of professional ethics and
integrity of HCJ current members and candidates,
● conducting competitions for these positions.

Over the course of approximately a year and a half of operation, the Ethics Council succeeded in analyzing, conducting interviews, and rendering decisions on more than one hundred people. All this occurred against the backdrop of a full-scale Russian invasion of the territory of Ukraine, which introduced its own modifications.

Based on its favorable assessments, it became feasible to fill 13 vacant positions of the HCJ members, thereby reinstating the operations of this institution. For the first time, a representative from the public was selected for the HCJ — this would not have been possible without an open competition and the involvement of international experts in the Ethics Council.

Despite these positive achievements, during the research, we identified shortcomings and problems that occurred at each stage of the competition and evaluation, which we described in detail at the end of each section of this report. These shortcomings can be overcome by following the following recommendations.

View
New rules bring new risks. What the draft law on the selection of HCJ members changes
New rules bring new risks. What the draft law on the selection of HCJ members changes

The government’s draft law submitted to the Venice Commission for consideration, in addition to a new procedure for forming the HQCJ, also substantially changes the procedures for electing (appointing) members of the High Council of Justice (HCJ). The proposed changes may create new risks for...

Two Supreme Court judges recommended for dismissal, but one of them may manage to resign first
Two Supreme Court judges recommended for dismissal, but one of them may manage to resign first

The Third Disciplinary Chamber has moved to dismiss Supreme Court judges Iryna Hryhorieva and Zhanna Yelenina. The Disciplinary Chamber voted unanimously for this decision; the rapporteur in the case was HCJ member Oleh Kandziuba. Both judges were implicated in the case of the nearly $3 million brib...

Amelokhin next? Another DACK judge moves closer to dismissal
Amelokhin next? Another DACK judge moves closer to dismissal

The High Council of Justice has recommended the dismissal of yet another associate of Pavlo Vovk — DACK judge Vitalii Amelokhin. The grounds were the “DACK tapes.” On the recordings, Vovk instructs Amelokhin, and the latter agrees, to draw up a plan of interrogations and investigative...

THE “REBOOTED” HIGH COUNCIL OF JUSTICE:WINS AND FAILS
Judicial reform roadmap