In the name of Ukraine — against Ukraine: judge Konstantinova’s ruling in the Kudrytskyi case - 5046B
Back

In the name of Ukraine — against Ukraine: judge Konstantinova’s ruling in the Kudrytskyi case

In Kyiv, a judge whose family openly glorifies the “Russian world” has sent another former state official behind bars — this time, the former head of Ukrenergo. The Pechersk District Court of Kyiv imposed a preventive measure on former Ukrenergo CEO Volodymyr Kudrytskyi, ordering two months of detention with the possibility of bail set at 13.7 million UAH.

According to the State Bureau of Investigation (SBI), the case concerns alleged fraudulent misappropriation of Ukrenergo’s funds back in 2018, when Kudrytskyi served as deputy head of the company. He denies the accusations, calling them “absurd.”

Notably, the ruling was issued by judge Kristina Konstantinova, well known for her controversial decisions in cases against civil activists. It was Konstantinova who authorised searches in the homes of Automaidan activists and later placed Serhii Filimonov and the late Roman Ratushnyi under house arrest on fabricated charges — merely for supporting Serhii Sternenko at peaceful assemblies.

Adding to the controversy, the judge’s daughter once posted an Instagram video justifying the annexation of Crimea, using the phrase “Ukrainian trash” and calling Ukrainians “cattle.”

Thus, when a judge whose own daughter spreads openly anti-Ukrainian rhetoric orders the arrest of a former state company head in a politically motivated case, it becomes yet another chapter in the long story of how Ukraine’s courts are turned into instruments of pressure.

As long as judges like Konstantinova continue to issue rulings “in the name of Ukraine” but in favor of its enemies, the judiciary will remain a key battleground for Russian influence in Kyiv. That is why cleaning up the courts is, above all, a matter of national security.

Other news
To the section
New rules bring new risks. What the draft law on the selection of HCJ members changes
New rules bring new risks. What the draft law on the selection of HCJ members changes

The government’s draft law submitted to the Venice Commission for consideration, in addition to a new procedure for forming the HQCJ, also substantially changes the procedures for electing (appointing) members of the High Council of Justice (HCJ). The proposed changes may create new risks for...

The government proposes a “broken bicycle” for international experts in the commission selecting HQCJ members
The government proposes a “broken bicycle” for international experts in the commission selecting HQCJ members

The High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) is a body that can recommend a person for the position of judge or recommend their dismissal. That is, whoever decides your case, should you suddenly have to go to court, depends on the HQCJ’s assessment. Judges over judges, so to speak. Logi...

DACK cases and judges can end up in the same court again
DACK cases and judges can end up in the same court again

The High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) has recommended transferring 6 judges of the liquidated DACK to the Kyiv District Administrative Court (KDAC). All the cases of the liquidated DACK had previously been transferred to the KDAC as well. In other words, the nameplate has changed, but...

Special by topic
To the section
Bar Reform Roadmap
Supreme Court Unmasked: Corruption, Opposing Reforms and Russian Passports
Judicial Reform Roadmap