“It’s simpler that way” How is punishment for juveniles determined in Ukraine? - B6092
Back
“It’s simpler that way” How is punishment for juveniles determined in Ukraine?

“It’s simpler that way” How is punishment for juveniles determined in Ukraine?

In this report, we have established what international standards should be followed by participants in criminal proceedings against juveniles in conflict with the law in terms of sentencing, what regulatory barriers to their provision exist and how relevant the case law is to them. The main recommendation for judges and prosecutors, which will allow implementing the principles of child-friendly justice, when sentencing under the current law, is to apply the algorithm for selecting measures of influence against juveniles:

  1. Exemption from criminal liability (and the application of the compulsory measures of the educational character (CMEC) or the Recovery program for minors);
  2. Release from punishment with the use of CMEC;
  3. Imposition of a punishment not related to imprisonment on the basis of a sanction of an article of the Criminal Code;
  4. Sentencing not related to imprisonment under Art. 69 of the Criminal Code;
  5. Release from serving a probation sentence;
  6. Impose imprisonment for a minimum term.
View
New rules bring new risks. What the draft law on the selection of HCJ members changes
New rules bring new risks. What the draft law on the selection of HCJ members changes

The government’s draft law submitted to the Venice Commission for consideration, in addition to a new procedure for forming the HQCJ, also substantially changes the procedures for electing (appointing) members of the High Council of Justice (HCJ). The proposed changes may create new risks for...

The government proposes a “broken bicycle” for international experts in the commission selecting HQCJ members
The government proposes a “broken bicycle” for international experts in the commission selecting HQCJ members

The High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) is a body that can recommend a person for the position of judge or recommend their dismissal. That is, whoever decides your case, should you suddenly have to go to court, depends on the HQCJ’s assessment. Judges over judges, so to speak. Logi...

DACK cases and judges can end up in the same court again
DACK cases and judges can end up in the same court again

The High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) has recommended transferring 6 judges of the liquidated DACK to the Kyiv District Administrative Court (KDAC). All the cases of the liquidated DACK had previously been transferred to the KDAC as well. In other words, the nameplate has changed, but...

Bar Reform Roadmap
Supreme Court Unmasked: Corruption, Opposing Reforms and Russian Passports
Judicial Reform Roadmap