Models for trying war crimes and other significant human rights violations within the national judicial system - CF495
Back
Models for trying war crimes and other significant human rights violations within the national judicial system

Models for trying war crimes and other significant human rights violations within the national judicial system

Undoubtedly, Ukraine wants to investigate international crimes committed during Russia’s armed aggression. However, the critical issue is whether Ukraine is capable of doing it effectively while maintaining international legal standards in the field of human rights. International law experts have already questioned the ability of Ukrainian judges to consider cases involving Russian servicemen in an impartial and fair manner, and some decisions of Ukrainian courts regarding international crimes have been criticized.

This research paper is meant to describe possible models of trying international crimes that can be implemented into Ukraine’s national judicial system to ensure their due review and trial. The authors describe in detail the very idea, the procedure for implementation, as well as the pros and cons of every judicial model.

The paper begins with an overview of Ukraine’s current judicial system and its ability to try cases of international crimes. This is followed by a description of the models themselves: specialization of judges, a separate Specialized Court, and a hybrid tribunal with international judges. At the end of the paper, the authors emphasize the importance of involving international experts to facilitate the proper trial of international crimes.

Such models and tools can improve the validity of judicial decisions and ensure compliance with the standards and guarantees of a fair trial in cases of international crimes.

Читати українською

View
€286 million for a “reform” that helps judges avoid accountability?
€286 million for a “reform” that helps judges avoid accountability?

The EU is about to pay Ukraine €3 billion for 10 implemented reforms. One of them is an updated review of judges’ integrity declarations. That one alone carries a payment of €286 million. According to European Pravda, the European Commission is proposing to disburse the funds to Ukraine un...

Supreme Court Plenum initiates a competition for more than 50 vacant positions
Supreme Court Plenum initiates a competition for more than 50 vacant positions

The Plenum of the Supreme Court (SC) is considering an application to the High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) to announce a competition for vacant positions. There are currently more than 50 vacancies. Filling all vacancies at the Supreme Court after the competition procedure has been im...

Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court overturns the dismissal of the “coffee-loving judges” from the court of appeal
Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court overturns the dismissal of the “coffee-loving judges” from the court of appeal

The Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court (GC SC) has overturned the decision of the High Council of Justice (HCJ) in the case of Kyiv Court of Appeal judges Ihor Palenyk, Yurii Slyva and Viktor Hlynianyi. These are the same judges from the story about a USD 35,000 bribe, where the money was found in&h...

Bar Reform Roadmap
Supreme Court Unmasked: Corruption, Opposing Reforms and Russian Passports
Judicial Reform Roadmap