Models for trying war crimes and other significant human rights violations within the national judicial system - 45191
Back
Models for trying war crimes and other significant human rights violations within the national judicial system

Models for trying war crimes and other significant human rights violations within the national judicial system

Undoubtedly, Ukraine wants to investigate international crimes committed during Russia’s armed aggression. However, the critical issue is whether Ukraine is capable of doing it effectively while maintaining international legal standards in the field of human rights. International law experts have already questioned the ability of Ukrainian judges to consider cases involving Russian servicemen in an impartial and fair manner, and some decisions of Ukrainian courts regarding international crimes have been criticized.

This research paper is meant to describe possible models of trying international crimes that can be implemented into Ukraine’s national judicial system to ensure their due review and trial. The authors describe in detail the very idea, the procedure for implementation, as well as the pros and cons of every judicial model.

The paper begins with an overview of Ukraine’s current judicial system and its ability to try cases of international crimes. This is followed by a description of the models themselves: specialization of judges, a separate Specialized Court, and a hybrid tribunal with international judges. At the end of the paper, the authors emphasize the importance of involving international experts to facilitate the proper trial of international crimes.

Such models and tools can improve the validity of judicial decisions and ensure compliance with the standards and guarantees of a fair trial in cases of international crimes.

Читати українською

View
New rules bring new risks. What the draft law on the selection of HCJ members changes
New rules bring new risks. What the draft law on the selection of HCJ members changes

The government’s draft law submitted to the Venice Commission for consideration, in addition to a new procedure for forming the HQCJ, also substantially changes the procedures for electing (appointing) members of the High Council of Justice (HCJ). The proposed changes may create new risks for...

The government proposes a “broken bicycle” for international experts in the commission selecting HQCJ members
The government proposes a “broken bicycle” for international experts in the commission selecting HQCJ members

The High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) is a body that can recommend a person for the position of judge or recommend their dismissal. That is, whoever decides your case, should you suddenly have to go to court, depends on the HQCJ’s assessment. Judges over judges, so to speak. Logi...

DACK cases and judges can end up in the same court again
DACK cases and judges can end up in the same court again

The High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) has recommended transferring 6 judges of the liquidated DACK to the Kyiv District Administrative Court (KDAC). All the cases of the liquidated DACK had previously been transferred to the KDAC as well. In other words, the nameplate has changed, but...

Bar Reform Roadmap
Supreme Court Unmasked: Corruption, Opposing Reforms and Russian Passports
Judicial Reform Roadmap