Replacing the Kyiv District Administrative Court: Selection process for new administrative courts begins - A43F6
Back

Replacing the Kyiv District Administrative Court: Selection process for new administrative courts begins

Ukraine’s justice system is taking another step toward finally eliminating the shadow of the notorious District Administrative Court of Kyiv (DACK). The High Qualification Commission of Judges (HQCJ) has announced a competition for judicial positions in two newly established courts — the Specialised District Administrative Court (SDAC) and the Specialised Administrative Court of Appeal (SAAC).

In total, 27 judges are to be selected: 17 for the court of first instance and 10 for the appellate court. Applications will be accepted from December 1 to December 23, 2025.

The new courts have been granted the status of higher specialised courts, empowered to consider administrative disputes against key state authorities — including the Cabinet of Ministers, ministries, central executive bodies, the National Bank, NABU, SAPO, and NACP. Their rulings will carry significant political and national importance.

The SDAC and SAAC were created to replace the liquidated DACK — one of the most infamous courts in Ukraine, long associated with politically motivated and anti-Ukrainian rulings. For comparison: the former DACK had 49 judges, while the new courts will employ nearly half as many, which may pose challenges related to caseload and the quality of case review.

The selection process will include a qualification exam, special background checks, and interviews. Integrity screening of candidates will be conducted by an Expert Council consisting of three Ukrainian and three international experts.

Professional and high-integrity candidates are strongly encouraged to apply. The DEJURE Foundation will closely monitor the formation of these new courts — SDAC and SAAC — which must become a model of independent justice, not a continuation of DACK’s corrupt legacy.

Other news
To the section
New rules bring new risks. What the draft law on the selection of HCJ members changes
New rules bring new risks. What the draft law on the selection of HCJ members changes

The government’s draft law submitted to the Venice Commission for consideration, in addition to a new procedure for forming the HQCJ, also substantially changes the procedures for electing (appointing) members of the High Council of Justice (HCJ). The proposed changes may create new risks for...

The government proposes a “broken bicycle” for international experts in the commission selecting HQCJ members
The government proposes a “broken bicycle” for international experts in the commission selecting HQCJ members

The High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) is a body that can recommend a person for the position of judge or recommend their dismissal. That is, whoever decides your case, should you suddenly have to go to court, depends on the HQCJ’s assessment. Judges over judges, so to speak. Logi...

DACK cases and judges can end up in the same court again
DACK cases and judges can end up in the same court again

The High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) has recommended transferring 6 judges of the liquidated DACK to the Kyiv District Administrative Court (KDAC). All the cases of the liquidated DACK had previously been transferred to the KDAC as well. In other words, the nameplate has changed, but...

Special by topic
To the section
Bar Reform Roadmap
Supreme Court Unmasked: Corruption, Opposing Reforms and Russian Passports
Judicial Reform Roadmap