Replacing the Kyiv District Administrative Court: Selection process for new administrative courts begins - 6CDD1
Back

Replacing the Kyiv District Administrative Court: Selection process for new administrative courts begins

Ukraine’s justice system is taking another step toward finally eliminating the shadow of the notorious District Administrative Court of Kyiv (DACK). The High Qualification Commission of Judges (HQCJ) has announced a competition for judicial positions in two newly established courts — the Specialised District Administrative Court (SDAC) and the Specialised Administrative Court of Appeal (SAAC).

In total, 27 judges are to be selected: 17 for the court of first instance and 10 for the appellate court. Applications will be accepted from December 1 to December 23, 2025.

The new courts have been granted the status of higher specialised courts, empowered to consider administrative disputes against key state authorities — including the Cabinet of Ministers, ministries, central executive bodies, the National Bank, NABU, SAPO, and NACP. Their rulings will carry significant political and national importance.

The SDAC and SAAC were created to replace the liquidated DACK — one of the most infamous courts in Ukraine, long associated with politically motivated and anti-Ukrainian rulings. For comparison: the former DACK had 49 judges, while the new courts will employ nearly half as many, which may pose challenges related to caseload and the quality of case review.

The selection process will include a qualification exam, special background checks, and interviews. Integrity screening of candidates will be conducted by an Expert Council consisting of three Ukrainian and three international experts.

Professional and high-integrity candidates are strongly encouraged to apply. The DEJURE Foundation will closely monitor the formation of these new courts — SDAC and SAAC — which must become a model of independent justice, not a continuation of DACK’s corrupt legacy.

Other news
To the section
The Committee recommended adopting an even worse draft law than the one criticised by the Venice Commission
The Committee recommended adopting an even worse draft law than the one criticised by the Venice Commission

On 30 September, the Verkhovna Rada Committee on Legal Policy recommended that Parliament adopt, as a basis, draft law No. 16018 on competitions for the High Qualifications Commission of Judges and the High Council of Justice. The authors of the draft law are Volodymyr Vatras, Ivan Kalaur and Mykola...

Venice Commission has criticised the government’s model of selection to the HQCJ
Venice Commission has criticised the government’s model of selection to the HQCJ

The High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) selects candidates for judicial positions and evaluates sitting judges. Its decisions determine who will work in Ukrainian courts. That is why it is crucial who selects the members of the HQCJ itself, and under what rules. In 2027, almost the entir...

€286 million for a “reform” that helps judges avoid accountability?
€286 million for a “reform” that helps judges avoid accountability?

The EU is about to pay Ukraine €3 billion for 10 implemented reforms. One of them is an updated review of judges’ integrity declarations. That one alone carries a payment of €286 million. According to European Pravda, the European Commission is proposing to disburse the funds to Ukraine un...

Special by topic
To the section
Bar Reform Roadmap
Supreme Court Unmasked: Corruption, Opposing Reforms and Russian Passports
Judicial Reform Roadmap