The Verkhovna Rada Attempts to Undermine Public Oversight - 4BEAC
Back

The Verkhovna Rada Attempts to Undermine Public Oversight

The Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine is pushing forward two draft laws, №7033-д and №11533, that could restrict access to court register decisions and property location data. This would prevent journalists from exposing corrupt officials, hinder the public from assessing the integrity of candidates for public office, and deprive ordinary citizens of the ability to verify property ownership before purchase.

№7033-д:

  • Limits access to information and decisions in the Unified State Register of Court Decisions. The public had previously called for this draft law to be rejected, leading to its revision by the Legal Policy Committee. However, according to our information, even after revision, the draft still contains disproportionate restrictions.

  • Proposes to conceal court decisions related to conscription and mobilisation (Articles 336–336-2 of the Criminal Code), as well as lawsuits filed by Territorial Recruitment Centres (TRCS) regarding restrictions on the right to drive during martial law and for one year afterwards. It is unclear how such decisions could pose a threat to national security.

  • Grants judges the right to arbitrarily remove information from court decisions that “may endanger security” in cases heard in open court. This creates significant corruption risks, as it effectively allows judges to hide any information under the pretext of “security.”

№11533:

  • Proposes restricting access to data on property locations and cadastral numbers of land plots during martial law and for one year afterwards. If adopted, the public will only be able to view information about the country or administrative region where a property is located, and nothing more. This would jeopardise public oversight and the work of journalists investigating corruption.

  • The DEJURE Foundation has already appealed to the National Agency on Corruption Prevention (NACP) to conduct an anti-corruption review, which, as it turns out, has not yet been done for this draft law.

More on other draft laws that obstruct judicial reform can be found here.

Other news
To the section
New rules bring new risks. What the draft law on the selection of HCJ members changes
New rules bring new risks. What the draft law on the selection of HCJ members changes

The government’s draft law submitted to the Venice Commission for consideration, in addition to a new procedure for forming the HQCJ, also substantially changes the procedures for electing (appointing) members of the High Council of Justice (HCJ). The proposed changes may create new risks for...

The government proposes a “broken bicycle” for international experts in the commission selecting HQCJ members
The government proposes a “broken bicycle” for international experts in the commission selecting HQCJ members

The High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) is a body that can recommend a person for the position of judge or recommend their dismissal. That is, whoever decides your case, should you suddenly have to go to court, depends on the HQCJ’s assessment. Judges over judges, so to speak. Logi...

DACK cases and judges can end up in the same court again
DACK cases and judges can end up in the same court again

The High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) has recommended transferring 6 judges of the liquidated DACK to the Kyiv District Administrative Court (KDAC). All the cases of the liquidated DACK had previously been transferred to the KDAC as well. In other words, the nameplate has changed, but...

Special by topic
To the section
Bar Reform Roadmap
Supreme Court Unmasked: Corruption, Opposing Reforms and Russian Passports
Judicial Reform Roadmap