The Verkhovna Rada Attempts to Undermine Public Oversight - 41555
Back

The Verkhovna Rada Attempts to Undermine Public Oversight

The Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine is pushing forward two draft laws, №7033-д and №11533, that could restrict access to court register decisions and property location data. This would prevent journalists from exposing corrupt officials, hinder the public from assessing the integrity of candidates for public office, and deprive ordinary citizens of the ability to verify property ownership before purchase.

№7033-д:

  • Limits access to information and decisions in the Unified State Register of Court Decisions. The public had previously called for this draft law to be rejected, leading to its revision by the Legal Policy Committee. However, according to our information, even after revision, the draft still contains disproportionate restrictions.

  • Proposes to conceal court decisions related to conscription and mobilisation (Articles 336–336-2 of the Criminal Code), as well as lawsuits filed by Territorial Recruitment Centres (TRCS) regarding restrictions on the right to drive during martial law and for one year afterwards. It is unclear how such decisions could pose a threat to national security.

  • Grants judges the right to arbitrarily remove information from court decisions that “may endanger security” in cases heard in open court. This creates significant corruption risks, as it effectively allows judges to hide any information under the pretext of “security.”

№11533:

  • Proposes restricting access to data on property locations and cadastral numbers of land plots during martial law and for one year afterwards. If adopted, the public will only be able to view information about the country or administrative region where a property is located, and nothing more. This would jeopardise public oversight and the work of journalists investigating corruption.

  • The DEJURE Foundation has already appealed to the National Agency on Corruption Prevention (NACP) to conduct an anti-corruption review, which, as it turns out, has not yet been done for this draft law.

More on other draft laws that obstruct judicial reform can be found here.

Other news
To the section
The Committee recommended adopting an even worse draft law than the one criticised by the Venice Commission
The Committee recommended adopting an even worse draft law than the one criticised by the Venice Commission

On 30 September, the Verkhovna Rada Committee on Legal Policy recommended that Parliament adopt, as a basis, draft law No. 16018 on competitions for the High Qualifications Commission of Judges and the High Council of Justice. The authors of the draft law are Volodymyr Vatras, Ivan Kalaur and Mykola...

Venice Commission has criticised the government’s model of selection to the HQCJ
Venice Commission has criticised the government’s model of selection to the HQCJ

The High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) selects candidates for judicial positions and evaluates sitting judges. Its decisions determine who will work in Ukrainian courts. That is why it is crucial who selects the members of the HQCJ itself, and under what rules. In 2027, almost the entir...

Izovitova is concealing the decision that has allowed her to lead the attorney profession for 14 years
Izovitova is concealing the decision that has allowed her to lead the attorney profession for 14 years

On the left in the image is Serhii Osyka, an attorney and member of the Bar Council of Ukraine (BCU). In 2022, he took part in adopting the BCU decision that allows Medvedchuk’s associate Lidiia Izovitova to avoid elections within the attorney profession and to lead it for the 14th year now. Izovi...

Special by topic
To the section
Bar Reform Roadmap
Supreme Court Unmasked: Corruption, Opposing Reforms and Russian Passports
Judicial Reform Roadmap