Overdue reforms: what is happening with legal education on the path to the EU - 2DAF7
Back

Overdue reforms: what is happening with legal education on the path to the EU

The Parliament has missed the deadline for adopting a draft law that is part of the required reforms on Ukraine’s path to the European Union. This concerns legislative initiatives in the field of legal education that were supposed to enter into force by the end of the first quarter of 2026.

The Government approved the Rule of Law Roadmap back in May 2025. The measures scheduled for implementation in the first three months of 2026 are still awaiting progress. In particular, item 1.5.1, aimed at reforming the professional training of lawyers.

More details on the progress of fulfilling these requirements can be found in the article by the DEJURE Foundation. In it, an expert on legal education explains that the Roadmap provides for the adoption of a separate law aimed at:

  • defining the legal foundations of legal training and initial access to the legal profession;

  • institutionally separating legal education from the training of law enforcement personnel;

  • revising and strengthening the system of accreditation of legal education programs.

All of this is necessary to avoid endlessly overloading the courts and instead train lawyers in line with European professional standards. In addition, there are a number of legislative initiatives intended to regulate multi-million bonuses granted largely for questionable academic degrees held by judges. As established by DEJURE Foundation experts, hundreds of millions of hryvnias are spent on these bonuses from the state budget.

The final deadline for adopting the document expired on March 31. The draft law has not been adopted; moreover, it has not even been registered in Parliament. According to available information, the draft was prepared as early as mid-last year, and members of Parliament received it at that time. The Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine, responsible for implementing this item, only at the beginning of 2026 attempted to create a separate working group to draft the law. This is yet another example of desynchronization between the Government and Parliament.

In addition, items 1.5.6 and 1.5.7 remain unfulfilled:

1.5.6 — Unification of standards for legal education students and revision of the Unified State Qualification Exam program based on new unified standards, with a focus on teaching EU law, ethics, and professional responsibility of lawyers — the deadline for this item expired in the second quarter of 2025, that is, on June 30.

1.5.7 — Extending the requirement to pass the Unified State Qualification Exam in law, law enforcement, and international law to graduates of all categories without exceptions (through amendments to the Cabinet of Ministers Resolution of May 21, 2019, No. 497) — this was to be implemented by the end of December 2025.

As a result, we see a situation typical for Ukrainian authorities: the requirements for moving toward the EU are formally established, deadlines are set, but their actual implementation is absent. While necessary decisions remain stalled between the Government, Parliament, and relevant authorities, European integration does not accelerate — it is slowed down by inaction.

Other news
To the section
The Committee recommended adopting an even worse draft law than the one criticised by the Venice Commission
The Committee recommended adopting an even worse draft law than the one criticised by the Venice Commission

On 30 September, the Verkhovna Rada Committee on Legal Policy recommended that Parliament adopt, as a basis, draft law No. 16018 on competitions for the High Qualifications Commission of Judges and the High Council of Justice. The authors of the draft law are Volodymyr Vatras, Ivan Kalaur and Mykola...

Venice Commission has criticised the government’s model of selection to the HQCJ
Venice Commission has criticised the government’s model of selection to the HQCJ

The High Qualifications Commission of Judges (HQCJ) selects candidates for judicial positions and evaluates sitting judges. Its decisions determine who will work in Ukrainian courts. That is why it is crucial who selects the members of the HQCJ itself, and under what rules. In 2027, almost the entir...

€286 million for a “reform” that helps judges avoid accountability?
€286 million for a “reform” that helps judges avoid accountability?

The EU is about to pay Ukraine €3 billion for 10 implemented reforms. One of them is an updated review of judges’ integrity declarations. That one alone carries a payment of €286 million. According to European Pravda, the European Commission is proposing to disburse the funds to Ukraine un...

Special by topic
To the section
Problems of Legal Education and Ways to Resolve Them
7 Myths about the Concept of Legal Education Development and who benefits from them