Interaction between the civil society and the public authorities in the process of selection and evaluation of the judiciary: search for the effective model - A92EC
Support
UA EN

HQCJ

There are no obstacles to the formation of the High Qualification Commission of Judges

The HQCJ can appoint eight judges to the HQCJ from the ten proposed candidates or limit itself to 6, which is necessary for the HQCJ to become operational (Part 4 of Article 92 of the Law). In the second case, an additional competition will have to be held.

If the HCJ believes that among the ten proposed candidates-judges there are eight decent ones to be appointed to the HQCJ, then there are no legal provisions that would not allow the HCJ to form an operational composition of the HQCJ right now.

Judicial reform roadmap

JUDICIAL REFORM ROADMAP JUDICIAL REFORM ROADMAP Requirement #1 Requirement #2 Requirement #3 Requirement #4 EN УКР JUDICIAL REFORM ROADMAP Requirement #1 Requirement #2 Requirement #3 Requirement #4 Facebook Twitter Behance Instagram Renewed HCJ and HQCJ WHAT IS NEEDED FOR ESTABLISHING A TRULY INDEPENDENT JUDICIARY OF HIGH INTEGRITY IN UKRAINE? an independent judiciary is only possible… Continue reading Judicial reform roadmap

Ukrainians trust public and international experts rather than judges to select judges – the survey

Almost half of Ukrainians surveyed believe that judges should be selected by independent public experts – investigative journalists and other civil society representatives. Slightly less than 30% assign this role to independent international experts. Ukrainians expressed the least confidence in the selection of judges to judges and politicians themselves. This is shown by a study… Continue reading Ukrainians trust public and international experts rather than judges to select judges – the survey

Interaction between the civil society and the public authorities in the process of selection and evaluation of the judiciary: search for the effective model

The policy-brief describes legal regulation of the Public Integrity Council’s status, analyzes foreign experience of public participation in the selection of judges and looks for ways to address the issue by offering three models.